Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;2022(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2

Kahl 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Retrospective, multicentre cohort study
Participants 793 women with FIGO stage IIIB to IV
Median age, years (range) (% < 55 years): 60 (19 to 88)
ECOG performance status (PS): 0 to 683 (86.1%); > 0 to 110 (13.9%)
FIGO stages, n (%):
  • IIIB ‐ 110 (13.9%)

  • Stage IIIC ‐ 318 (40.1%)

  • Stage IV ‐ 365 (46.0%)


Ascites, mL: ≤ 500 to 450 (56.7%); > 500 to 343 (43.3%)
Histology: high‐grade serous ‐ 660 (83.2%); others ‐ 133 (16.8%)
Surgical complexity score: low/intermediate (≤ 7) ‐ 165 (20.8%); high (≤ 8) ‐ 628 (79.2%)
Lymph node dissection: systematic ‐ 472 (59.5%); sampling ‐ 111 (14%); no ‐ 210 (26.5%)
CDC: 0 to 2 ‐ 593 (74.8%); 3 to 4 ‐ 176 (22.1%); 5 ‐ 24 (3.0%)
Germany
Residual disease details Procedure performed by accredited gynaecological oncologist
All women underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by postoperative systemic therapy with platinum‐based chemotherapy
Residual disease was noted as follows, n (%):
  • NMRD: 482 (60.8%)

  • SVRD (1 mm to 10 mm): 226 (28.5%)

  • LVRD (> 10 mm): 85 (10.7%)


Women were divided into 3 groups based on their age‐adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI): low (0 to 1), intermediate (2 to 3), and high (≥ 4)
Postoperative surgical complications were graded according to the Clavien‐Dindo classification (CDC)
Outcomes Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS:
Residual disease (versus NMRD):
  • SVRD (1 mm to 10 mm): HR 1.96 (95% CI 1.55 to 2.46)

  • LVRD (> 10 mm): HR 2.75 (95% CI 2.01 to 3.77)


Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for high complications (CDC 3 to 5):
  • Surgical complexity score: high (≤ 8): RR 1.70 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.85)

  • Blood loss: ≥ 500: RR 1.0 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.44)

  • Duration of surgery, minutes: ≥ 360: RR 1.84 (95% CI 1.24 to 2.72)

Risk of bias (QUIPS) 1. Study participation (a‐f): low risk
Adequate number of participants and description of target population. Baseline characteristics, eligibility criteria, sampling frame and period/place study took place presented clearly.
2. Study attrition (a‐e): unclear risk
Unclear if patients with incomplete follow‐up were excluded before arriving at the stated sample size. Insufficient information to permit judgement.
3. Prognostic factor measurement (a‐f): unclear risk
Valid and reliable measurement of RD. Multicentre design may introduce heterogeneity in measurement of RD
Outcome level assessment:
Outcome: overall survival
4. Outcome measurement (a‐c): low risk
Valid and reliable measurement of outcome
5. Adjustment for other prognostic factors (a‐g): unclear risk
Ascites dichotomised along arbitrary cutoff of 500 mL. Multivariate model predicting OS adjusted for ACCI, ECOG, FIGO stage, histology and ascites.
6. Statistical analysis and reporting (a‐d): high risk
No conceptual framework; criteria for variable selection into multivariate model is unclear. Dichotomisation of continuous variables also apparent.
Outcome: progression‐free survival
Not reported
Notes After a median follow‐up was 47 months (interquartile range 18 to 87 months), 397 (50.1%) women had died.
Significant differences between the 3 ACCI groups were detected for performance status (ECOG 0: 95.7% vs 84.2% vs 65.9%) and residual disease (NMRD 70.7% vs 55.3% vs 49.6%).
Residual disease after debulking surgery was significantly more frequent in women with a high ACCI compared with women with an intermediate or low ACCI (50.4% vs 44.7% vs 29.3%)
The mortality rate in the low‐ACCI group was 1.2%, in the intermediate‐ACCI group it was 2.3% and it was 9.8% for the high‐ACCI group