Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;2022(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2

Tseng 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods Retrospective cohort study
Participants 978 women with stage IIIB to IV ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma
Median age was 61 years (range: 19 to 95 years)
FIGO stage ‐ n (%):
  • IIIB: 33 (3%)

  • IIIC: 761 (78%)

  • IV: 184 (19%)


Histology ‐ n (%):
  • Serous: 869 (89%)

  • Other: 109 (11%)


Estimated blood loss: 700 mL (range: 5 mL to 8000 mL)
Median hospital length of stay was 8 days (range 1 to 22 days)
USA
Residual disease details Speciality of surgeon not reported
All women underwent primary debulking surgery followed by intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in (n = 949, 99%)
Residual disease was classed as follows:
  • NMRD (defined as complete gross resection (CGR) in study) ‐ 0 mm: 408 (42%)

  • SVRD (1 to 10 mm): 378 (39%)

  • LVRD (> 10 mm): 192 (20%)

Outcomes Multivariable analysis of factors associated with PFS adjusted for PDS‐year group
Residual disease:
  • NMRD: (AHR: reference)

  • SVRD: (AHR 1.393, 95% CI 1.174 to 1.654)

  • LVRD: (AHR 1.921, 95% CI 1.547 to 2.386)


Multivariable analysis of factors associated with OS adjusted for PDS‐year group
Residual disease:
  • NMRD: (AHR: reference)

  • SVRD: (AHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.118 to 1.653)

  • LVRD: (AHR 1.751, 95% CI 1.378 to 2.224)


Median operative time was 280 minutes (range, 36 to 893 minutes)
Median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 8 days (range: 1 to 22 days)
30‐day all‐cause mortality was 0.4% (4 deaths)
Risk of bias (QUIPS) 1. Study participation (a‐f): low risk
Adequate number of participants and description of target population. Baseline characteristics, eligibility criteria, sampling frame and period/place study took place presented clearly.
2. Study attrition (a‐e): unclear risk
Unclear if patients with incomplete follow‐up were excluded before arriving at the stated sample size. Insufficient information to permit judgement.
3. Prognostic factor measurement (a‐f): low risk
Valid and reliable measurement of RD
Outcome level assessment:
Outcome: overall survival
4. Outcome measurement (a‐c): low risk
Valid and reliable measurement of outcome
5. Adjustment for other prognostic factors (a‐g): low risk
Multivariate models for OS adjusted for age, albumin, FIGO stage, ASA score, histology, BRCA, tumour index, and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy
6. Statistical analysis and reporting (a‐d): high risk
No conceptual framework; unclear of variable selection criteria for multivariate analysis
Outcome: progression‐free survival
4. Outcome measurement (a‐c): low risk
Valid and reliable measurement of outcome
5. Adjustment for other prognostic factors (a‐g): low risk
Multivariate models for PFS adjusted for age, albumin, FIGO stage, ASA score, histology, BRCA, tumour index and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy
6. Statistical analysis and reporting (a‐d): high risk
No conceptual framework; unclear of variable selection criteria for multivariate analysis
Notes Median follow‐up for the entire cohort was 77.7 months (range: 1.3 to 198 months)