Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;6(3):txac124. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac124

Table 3.

Growth performance of the pigs supplemented with monocalcium phosphate (MCP) or phytase1

Diet IBW2, kg FBW2, kg ADG2, g/d ADFI2, g/d Gain: feed, g/kg
MCP, %
 0.25 7.4 14.9 359 521 691
 0.60 7.4 16.0 410 563 729
 0.95 7.4 16.8 447 591 757
Phytase, U/kg
 500 7.4 16.9 451 602 749
 1,000 7.4 17.6 484 628 771
 2,000 7.4 17.7 490 627 782
 3,000 7.4 17.7 490 624 787
Ca/P ratio
 1.05 7.4 17.5 480 618 778
 1.20 7.4 17.4 477 623 766
SD3 0.09 0.43 20 26 19
P value
 MCP L4 0.28 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Q4 0.60 0.46 0.52 0.61 0.63
 Phytase L5 0.71 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Q5 0.40 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
 Ca/P ratio6 0.68 0.64 0.59 0.55 <0.05

There were six replicates of eight pigs.

IBW, initial body weight; FBW, final body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake.

SD, standard deviation.

Linear and quadratic effects of monocalcium phosphate.

Linear and quadratic effects of phytase.

The effect of Ca/P ratio compares phytase diets between the ratios of 1.05 and 1.20, and no significant interaction between phytase and the Ca/P ratio was observed.