Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;6(3):txac124. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac124

Table 4.

Bone mineralization of the pigs supplemented with monocalcium phosphate (MCP) or phytase1

Diet Bone ash, % Bone ash Ca, % BoneashP, % Bone ash, g Bone Ca, g Bone P, g Bone Ca/P ratio
MCP, %
 0.25 43.7 33.8 16.9 3.18 1.07 0.53 2.00
 0.60 46.0 33.6 17.0 4.01 1.34 0.68 1.98
 0.95 50.1 33.4 17.2 5.09 1.70 0.88 1.94
Phytase, U/kg
 500 48.0 33.9 17.3 4.51 1.51 0.78 1.96
 1,000 48.2 34.0 17.6 4.87 1.64 0.85 1.92
 2,000 50.6 34.4 17.6 5.28 1.80 0.93 1.94
 3,000 50.2 34.6 17.7 5.36 1.84 0.94 1.95
Ca/P ratio
 1.05 49.0 33.6 17.4 4.95 1.65 0.86 1.93
 1.20 49.5 34.8 17.8 5.06 1.75 0.90 1.96
SD2 2.20 1.44 0.59 0.41 0.15 0.07 0.04
P value
 MCP L3 <0.01 0.67 0.32 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Q3 0.41 0.98 0.70 0.53 0.61 0.45 0.46
 Phytase L4 <0.01 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.09
Q4 <0.01 0.92 0.08 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
 Ca/P ratio5 0.41 <0.01 0.03 0.36 0.03 0.06 0.04

There were six replicates of one pig.

SD, standard deviation.

Linear and quadratic effects of monocalcium phosphate.

Linear and quadratic effects of phytase.

The effect of Ca/P ratio compares phytase diets between the ratios of 1.05 and 1.20, and no significant interaction between phytase and the Ca/P ratio was observed.