Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;11(9):e1417. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1417

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of the study population

Eosinophillow Eosinophilhigh P‐value
Age (year) 62 ± 6 62 ± 4 0.7
Gender: Male (%) 57 70 0.5
BMI (kg/m2) 29 (18–34) 25 (19–32) 0.1
Current smokers (%) 43 60 0.4
Pack‐years history 42 ± 15 38 ± 14 0.4
ICS use (%) 76 55 0.2
Post bronchodilator FEV1 (L) 1.8 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.4 0.45
Post bronchodilator FEV1 (% predicted) 62 ± 11 66 ± 11 0.4
Post bronchodilator FVC (L) 3.7 ± 1.2 3.6 ± 0.9 0.8
Post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio 50 ± 10 53 ± 7 0.3
Reversibility (mL) 190 ± 183 220 ± 154 0.6
FeNO50 (ppm) 15 (5–30) 21 (2–61) 0.2
Atopy (% positive) 0 0 N/A
Total SGRQ 42 ± 15 37 ± 21 0.4
mMRC 1 (1–4) 1 (0–4) 0.1
CAT 17 (5–35) 17 (4–32) 0.5
Exacerbation rate, 12 months prior 0 (0–3) 0 (0–3) 0.7
Blood eosinophils (cells μL−1) 100 (60–140) 410 (280–890) < 0.001
Sputum eosinophils (%) 0.5 (0.5–2.5) 4.5 (0.25–70) < 0.001
BAL eosinophils (%) 0 (0–3.25) 0.75 (0–8) 0.02

Data are presented as %, mean ± standard deviation, or median (range).

BMI, body mass index; CAT, COPD Assessment Test; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; FeNO50, fractional exhaled nitric oxide at 50 mL s−1 flow rate; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; mMRC, modified Medical Research Council; PPM, parts per million; SGRQ, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.