Table 4.

Comparison of the FER resistance between the CSSLs and the susceptible control line Ye478.

CSSL	Background recovery	Diseased area	Resistance Growth (%)	Bin	Marker
CL160	0.98	0.63	0.07	1.02	bnlg1614-umc2225
CL171		0.35	0.45	1.03	Y1q25-bumc1144
CL9	0.99	0.71	−0.04	1.04	Y1q102-Y1q112
CL172		0.81	−0.19	1.05	umc1076-umc1611
CL173		0.66	0.03	1.05, 1.06	umc1611-umc1590
CL82	0.98	0.88	−0.29	1.06	umc2235
CL14	0.99	0.94	−0.38	1.06	umc1664-umc1709
CL174		0.67	0.01	1.06, 1.07	umc1254-umc2237
CL45	0.97	0.88	−0.29	1.07, 1.08	umc2505-umc2240
CL61	0.98	0.69	−0.01	1.09	Y1q260-Y1q272
CL28	0.98	0.69	−0.01	1.11	umc1421-bnlg2123
CL21	0.98	0.89	−0.31	1.11	Y2q87358-Y2q724483
Ye478		0.68