Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;13:896800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896800

Table 2.

Summary of the interventions found.

Research Materials Instructor role Student role Student grouping Implementation/
Context
Program duration Intervention results Comments
Alfonzo and Batson (2014) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual For 4 days Greater use of digital tools than before training Has a sparse sample
Ata and Yildirim (2019) Does not specify Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher/face-to-face An academic year Increasing digital competence It should apply more evaluation tools
Ball (2019) Dashboard—training modules—Wikipedia guidelines and rules Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/face-to-face An academic year Increasing digital competence Does not indicate the method
Botturi (2019) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher 4 months Increasing digital competence Has a sparse sample
Campbell and Kapp (2020) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher/virtual 5 months Increasing digital competence Has a sparse sample
Carl and Strydom (2017) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual Do not specify Great interest and motivation on the part of the participants Does not use standardized instruments
Domingo-Coscolla et al. (2020) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher Do not specify Increasing digital competence Has a sparse sample/does not indicate duration
Elliott et al. (2018) Weekly Lectures-seminars-online resources-library Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/face-to-face An academic year Increased digital expertise and dominance Has a sparse sample
Elphick (2018) Conferences and seminars Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher/face-to-face One semester Increased digital expertise and dominance Does not use standardized instruments
Gabriele et al. (2019) Power point presentations—introductory videos of the software-brochures—applications created ad hoc Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher/face-to-face 10 months Increasing digital competence Has a sparse sample
Gill et al. (2015) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual For 3 years Practical knowledge of the application of ICT as a learning tool Has a sparse sample
Hamutoglu et al. (2019) Texts/documents—EDMODO Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher/face-to-face 5 weeks Increasing digital competence Has a sparse sample
Istenic et al. (2016) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual An educational technology course in the academic year 2011–2012 Creation of digital content for the teaching of mathematics Does not use standardized instruments
Kajee and Balfour (2011) Texts/documents—computer applications-Laboratory with computers–standalone server—printer Teacher—Researcher through 40 workstations Developer of each activity through 40 workstations Small group/face-to-face
Researcher
Specific laboratory
Two semesters of 14 weeks duration GE improvements greater than GC Has a sparse sample
Kuhn (2017) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual An academic year GE1 and GE2 improvements greater than GC Has a sparse sample
Lerdpornkulrat et al. (2019) Power point presentations—introductory videos of the software-brochures Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/face-to-face 13 sessions Increased self-efficacy in relation to standards and expectations It should apply more evaluation tools
Paige et al. (2016) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual Do not specify Creation of digital content for the teaching of mathematics Does not use standardized instruments
Pequeño et al. (2017) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual An academic year GE improvements greater than GC Has a sparse sample
Robertson et al. (2012) Texts/documents—computer applications—Photo Story 3 program Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/virtual For 3 years: 10 months New learning and means of expression Has a sparse sample
Sharp (2018) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Small group Researcher/face-to-face Two semesters GE1 and GE2 improvements greater than GC Has a sparse sample
Tomczyk et al. (2020) Texts/documents—SELI platform Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher/virtual Do not specify Increasing digital competence Does not indicate the process
Vinokurova et al. (2021) Texts/documents—specific computer applications—material with indications Teacher—Researcher Developer of each activity Great group Researcher/virtual Do not specify Increasing digital competence Omits data for possible replicability