Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;13:896800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896800

Table 7.

Treatment fidelity.

Research Moment Comparison of the control group Sequence of instruction Previous written protocol Comparable instructor training File Uniform and standard application
Alfonzo and Batson (2014) Pre
During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general 3 workshops: Library Orientation, APA style, ZOTERO Day 1: Library orientation, APA style. Day 2, 3, and 4: ZOTERO Does not specify Pre-evaluation, post-evaluation, and follow-up evaluation using qualtrics software Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Ata and Yildirim (2019) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Does not specify Does not specify Does not specify Does not specify Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Ball (2019) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Modules of history and editorial culture, markets, and media. Editorial Skills Module, Reading for Writing, and Grammar Development and General Literacy Does not specify Does not specify Portfolios and weekly blog Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Botturi (2019) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Agreed with students that provided instructions on the topics they wished to cover Does not specify Does not specify Balance Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Campbell and Kapp (2020) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Does not specify Does not specify Does not specify Questionnaires, portfolio, and interviews Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Carl and Strydom (2017) Pre
During
Expose
Follow
They evaluate the group in general although I am divided into two subgroups Stages: familiarization, indexing, graphing and cartography, and interpretation Familiarization -blo-share Does not specify -Recorded interviews - portfolio Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Domingo-Coscolla et al. (2020) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Does not specify Does not specify Does not specify Scales and focus groups Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Elliott et al. (2018) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Sessions with opportunities for group discussions and questions. Module essential reading was provided in weekly online study units Does not specify Broader university support from support staff specializing in academic skills in the “learning development team” and library staff. Questionnaires, essays, and portfolio Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Elphick (2018) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Conferences and seminars—direct observation—scales—interviews Does not specify Training sessions facilitated by an Apple professional
Authorized Development Coach
Narratives—presentations—classroom observations—comments and feedback—audiovisual recordings Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Gabriele et al. (2019) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general 1. Experimental research plan 2. The reading material was organized (power point presentations, introductory videos of the software, brochures, applications created ad hoc as examples) Does not specify Does not specify Scales and individual tests Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, tasks, and context
Gill et al. (2015) Pre
During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Of the different subjects related to ICT in the career Of the different subjects related to ICT in the career Does not specify Interviews Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Hamutoglu et al. (2019) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Preliminary tests of the first week. In the following week session on the Edmodo platform and an orientation training on the content of the course Does not specify Does not specify Two standardized scales Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Istenic et al. (2016) Pre
During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Six tasks Students completed the pre-test before the start of the study and the subsequent test 15 days later. Does not specify Digital Literacy Stories—Pre and Post-Assessment Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Kajee and Balfour (2011) Pre
During
Expose
Follow
Evaluation of the intervention group and another equivalent control group to verify differential efficacy Semester 1: Digital Writing
Semester 2: Digital Research
Does not specify Does not specify Digital literacy stories—semi-structured interviews—observations—access and sufficiency surveys—journal of researchers' reflections Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Kuhn (2017) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluation of the intervention group and another equivalent control group to verify differential efficacy Scales—exhibition—discussion groups Does not specify Does not specify Narratives—exhibitions—classroom observations—comments and feedback—audiovisual recordings Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Lerdpornkulrat et al. (2019) During
Expose
Follow
Only the GC participates in a formalized face-to-face activity based on the use of the course rubric as a self-assessment tool Through the rubric they were able to self-evaluate your own work After receiving feedback, both groups of students reviewed and resubmitted their feedback Complete projects again Does not specify Does not specify Questionnaires developed ad hoc—standardized questionnaires only the students of the experimental group participated in a formalized activity in the classroom
Paige et al. (2016) Pre
During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Slowmation, vivas, digital narratives, roundtables, interviews and oral assessments Slow Does not specify Pre- and post- intervention test—Scale Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Pequeño et al. (2017) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluation of the intervention group and another equivalent control group to verify differential efficacy Narrative—characteristics—exhibition—analysis—reworking—exhibition and possibilities Digital ethnography for examine relations with technologies and the media and how they mediate in the configuration of subjectivities Does not specify Narratives—exhibitions—classroom observations—comments and feedback—audiovisual recordings Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Robertson et al. (2012) Pre
During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Digital stories. After the presentation, you are asked to write a written reflection describing your experience Content analysis and categorization Does not specify Digital literacy stories of the—observations—journal of researcher's reflections Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Sharp (2018) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluation of the intervention group and another equivalent control group to verify differential efficacy Does not specify Does not specify Does not specify Scales Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Tomczyk et al. (2020) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Unspecified Does not specify Does not specify Scale Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks
Vinokurova et al. (2021) During
Expose
Follow
Evaluate the group in general Does not specify Does not specify Does not specify Theoretical analysis of the pedagogical experience, interpretation of scientific data, pedagogical design method (planning, modeling, and conducting classes), and analysis of empirical data in the form of a survey Equal application of the program to all students: same duration, sequence, context tasks

Indicators and controls used in the instructional intervention in the empirical studies reviewed.