TABLE 3.
Mean local efficiency and group differences for low- and high-parenting components, time 1 and 2 (n = 114).
| Parenting component | Low- | High- | Low–High (p) |
| Negativity EPI | |||
| Time 1 | 0.452 | 0.443 | 0.009a |
| Time 2 | 0.465 | 0.463 | 0.001 (0.937) |
| Time 2–Time 1 | 0.013 | 0.020 | |
| Omnibus p | 0.415 | ||
| Warmth | |||
| Time 1 | 0.450 | 0.468 | −0.018a |
| Time 2 | 0.456 | 0.484 | −0.029 (0.102) |
| Time 2–Time 1 | 0.005 | 0.016 | |
| Omnibus p | 0.527 | ||
| Negativity PSI | |||
| Time 1 | 0.461 | 0.451 | 0.010a |
| Time 2 | 0.449 | 0.457 | −0.008 (0.657) |
| Time 2–Time 1 | −0.012 | 0.005 | |
| Omnibus p | 0.623 | ||
| Communication | |||
| Time 1 | 0.451 | 0.479 | −0.028a |
| Time 2 | 0.451 | 0.461 | −0.010 (0.567) |
| Time 2–Time 1 | 0.013 | 0.020 | |
| Omnibus p | 0.471 | ||
EPI, event-planning interaction; PSI, problem-solving interaction. aNon-parametric permutation testing not conducted for Time 1 cross-sectional results. FDR (5%) adjusted p-values.