Summary of findings 2. Letrozole compared to laparoscopic ovarian drilling for infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Letrozole compared to laparoscopic ovarian drilling compared to placebo for infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome | ||||||
Patient or population: infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome Setting: (fertility) clinics or outpatient settings Intervention: letrozole with or without adjuncts followed by timed intercourse Comparison: laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) followed by timed intercourse | ||||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No. of participants (trials) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with LOD | Risk with letrozole | |||||
Live birth rate | 229 per 1000 | 380 per 1000 (227 to 561) | OR 2.07 (0.99 to 4.32) | 141 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very Lowa,b,c | |
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rate | No trials reported on this outcome | |||||
Clinical pregnancy rate | 290 per 1000 | 375 per 1000 (279 to 482) | OR 1.47 (0.95 to 2.28) | 376 (3 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b | |
Miscarriage rate per pregnancy | 151 per 1000 | 104 per 1000 (38 to 254) | OR 0.65 (0.22 to 1.92) | 122 (3 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b | |
Multiple pregnancy rate | 0 per 1000 | 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) | OR 3.00 (0.12 to 74.90) | 141 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very Lowa,b,c | |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
aInsufficient data to allow judgement of risk of bias in some trials ‐ downgraded one level for serious risk of bias. bThere is insufficient data to determine if there is a difference as opposed to no evidence of a difference ‐ downgraded one level for imprecision. cAnalysis is based on only one trial ‐ downgraded one additional level for imprecision.