Kamath 2010.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial Duration and location of the trial: quote: "This trial was conducted in a university teaching hospital between 2007 and 2009.“ |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: women with PCOS and clomiphene resistance who were being treated with ovulation induction. Additionally, women had to have a normal hormone profile and a male partner with normal semen parameters by WHO criteria. Normal hormone profile was defined as a FSH level of < 12 IU/L, serum prolactin level of < 25 ng/mL, and a TSH value between 0.3 µIU/mL and 4.5 µIU/mL. Exclusion criteria: women with other endocrine disorders such as Cushing syndrome, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia Number of centres: 1, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India Number of women randomised: 18 in each group Number of women analysed: 17 in each group Number of withdrawals/exclusions/loss to follow‐up and reasons: 2 lost to follow‐up before treatment started Age (y): group A letrozole: 25.6 ± 3.6, group B placebo: 25.7 ± 3.7 BMI (kg/m²): group A letrozole: 26.1 ± 3.7, group B placebo: 24.7 ± 4.2 Duration of infertility (y): group A letrozole: 5.2 ± 3.2, group B placebo: 3.6 ± 2.2 Country: India |
|
Interventions |
Group A: letrozole, orally given 2.5 mg/day for 5 days from cycle days 2‐6 Group B: placebo, also given for 5 days from cycle days 2‐6 |
|
Outcomes |
Primary Outcome: ovulation rate Secondary Outcomes: live birth rate, OHSS rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, endometrial thickness (mm), day 21 serum progesterone (nmoL/L), number of participants with mature follicle (%) |
|
Notes |
Ethical approval: yes, the protocol of the trial was approved by the institutional review board Informed consent: yes, written informed consent was obtained from each participant Source of funding: not stated Conflicts of interest: quote: "The Authors have nothing to disclose" Power calculation: quote: "Our literature pointed to a 75% ovulation rate when 2.5 mg of letrozole was used in women with PCOS who had clomiphene resistance. We hypothesized an ovulation rate of 60& with letrozole and 10% with placebo. On this basis, a sample size of 17 women in each arm (80% and alpha.05 for a two‐sided test) was calculated." Contacted authors about OHSS rate and how randomisation and allocation concealment were done in detail. All information provided |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomly distributed using a computer‐generated randomisation sequence in blocks of 6, into 2 groups. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation concealment was done by using consecutively‐numbered sealed opaque envelopes containing the treatment packets. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The randomisation code was maintained by the pharmacy department, which revealed the group assignments at the end of the trial. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The code was revealed after the statistical analysis had been performed. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 1 woman in each group was lost to follow‐up, after randomisation and before treatment started. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None |