Table 3.

MINORS assessment of included studies.

Study	MINORS criteria
	Clearly stated aim	Inclusion of consecutive patients	Prospective collection of data	Endpoints appropriate to the aims of the study	Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint	Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study	Loss to follow-up less than 5%	Prospective calculation of the study size	Total
Wolters 2011	2	1	2	2	1	2	2	0	12
Muto 2014	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	0	13
Migliari 2015	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	14
Hurle 2020	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	0	13
Soria 2020	2	2	0	2	2	2	2	2	14
Yang 2020	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	14
Zhou 2020	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	0	14
Xu 2021	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	0	13