Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;9:969380. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.969380

TABLE 4.

Accuracy comparison against baselines. The proposed method achieves the highest accuracy on all sequences. Although the gait cycle method has an accuracy closer to the proposed method, it does not remove false positives when gait cycle is violated.

Sequence Method % Accuracy % False Positive Rate % False Negative Rate
Leg RF Leg LF Leg RH Leg LH Leg Avg Leg Avg Leg Avg
Concrete Short Loop GRF Thresholding 73.43 70.02 71.69 70.04 71.30 37.07 13.24
Gait Cycle 85.66 84.98 84.68 85.11 85.11 22.95 0.00
Proposed Method 98.34 97.87 97.95 98.56 98.18 1.45 2.51
Grass Test Sequence GRF Thresholding 82.55 78.93 84.62 82.48 82.14 26.87 0.63
Gait Cycle 92.41 92.38 91.04 90.55 91.59 10.95 3.53
Proposed Method 98.08 97.57 97.73 97.73 97.78 2.35 1.98
Forest Test Sequence GRF Thresholding 80.99 80.09 82.75 83.24 81.77 26.54 1.84
Gait Cycle 83.03 82.56 84.44 84.28 83.58 24.71 0.08
Proposed Method 97.05 96.62 97.24 97.40 97.08 2.82 3.12

Bold values in tables show the best performance.