TABLE 4.
Accuracy comparison against baselines. The proposed method achieves the highest accuracy on all sequences. Although the gait cycle method has an accuracy closer to the proposed method, it does not remove false positives when gait cycle is violated.
| Sequence | Method | % Accuracy | % False Positive Rate | % False Negative Rate | ||||
| Leg RF | Leg LF | Leg RH | Leg LH | Leg Avg | Leg Avg | Leg Avg | ||
| Concrete Short Loop | GRF Thresholding | 73.43 | 70.02 | 71.69 | 70.04 | 71.30 | 37.07 | 13.24 |
| Gait Cycle | 85.66 | 84.98 | 84.68 | 85.11 | 85.11 | 22.95 | 0.00 | |
| Proposed Method | 98.34 | 97.87 | 97.95 | 98.56 | 98.18 | 1.45 | 2.51 | |
| Grass Test Sequence | GRF Thresholding | 82.55 | 78.93 | 84.62 | 82.48 | 82.14 | 26.87 | 0.63 |
| Gait Cycle | 92.41 | 92.38 | 91.04 | 90.55 | 91.59 | 10.95 | 3.53 | |
| Proposed Method | 98.08 | 97.57 | 97.73 | 97.73 | 97.78 | 2.35 | 1.98 | |
| Forest Test Sequence | GRF Thresholding | 80.99 | 80.09 | 82.75 | 83.24 | 81.77 | 26.54 | 1.84 |
| Gait Cycle | 83.03 | 82.56 | 84.44 | 84.28 | 83.58 | 24.71 | 0.08 | |
| Proposed Method | 97.05 | 96.62 | 97.24 | 97.40 | 97.08 | 2.82 | 3.12 | |
Bold values in tables show the best performance.