Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 9;4:278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.crstbi.2022.09.001

Table 1.

Number of hydrogen bonds and heavy-atom contacts between each drug and the protein (cut-off 4 ​Å). Average and standard deviations for each system were obtained over the whole triplicate simulation sampling (300 ns). The number of contacts using a larger cut-off distance of 5 ​Å is shown in Table S1, and follow the same trend.

a) drug positively and E65 negatively charged
Number of hydrogen bonds
Number of contacts
BDQ TBAJ-876 BDQ TBAJ-876
Lagging 1.4 ​± ​0.6 1.4 ​± ​0.5 Lagging 26.3 ​± ​4.2 32.2 ​± ​4.0
Leading 1.2 ​± ​0.5 1.1 ​± ​0.4 Leading 31.4 ​± ​4.9 35.4 ​± ​4.7
c-ring 1.2 ​± ​0.5 1.3 ​± ​0.5 c-ring 22.1 ​± ​3.5 23.0 ​± ​3.3
b) drug and E65 neutral
Number of hydrogen bonds Number of contacts
BDQ TBAJ-876 BDQ TBAJ-876
Lagging 1.0 ​± ​0.2 0.9 ​± ​0.3 Lagging 25.0 ​± ​3.8 28.1 ​± ​3.9
Leading 0.9 ​± ​0.3 1.0 ​± ​0.3 Leading 32.1 ​± ​3.8 32.7 ​± ​5.5
c-ring 0.8 ​± ​0.4 0.8 ​± ​0.4 c-ring 19.2 ​± ​3.4 19.8 ​± ​3.9