Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 19;30:101987. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101987

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Author/year/Country Garrote et al. 1995
Cuba
Sankaranarayanan et al. 2002
Cuba
Pei-Shan Ho et al., 2019
Taiwan
Chuang et al. 2017
Taiwan
Morikawa et al. 2020
Japan
Sankaranarayanan et al. 2013
India
Su et al. 2010
Taiwan
Study design Repeated cross-sectional Case control study Retrospective cohort study Population based cohort study Cohort study Cluster RCT
Clusters randomized at municipal level
RCT
Intervention National screening program, conducted by dentists Determination of screening history in advanced OC cases, part of the national screening program Analysis of Taiwan Oral mucosal screening program Invitational screening by medical healthcare workers Countermeasure screening (Invitational) House visit screening by trained healthcare workers TB staining for detection of OC and OPMD
Control Routine care, data taken from national cancer registry Three (3) healthy participants per each advanced OC case were recruited Individuals without screening history who were reported to have OC Data linked to National cancer registry used to identify cases in the control group, who did not attend screening Opportunistic screening Routine care Placebo dye staining for detection of OC and OPMD
Endpoints measured OC incidence
OC mortality
OC late-stage incidence OPMD incidence
OC incidence
OC late-stage incidence
OC mortality
OPMD incidence
OC incidence
OC late-stage incidence
OC mortality
OPMD incidence
OC incidence
OC incidence
OC late-stage incidence
OC mortality
OMPD incidence
OC incidence
Sample size IG 12 990 677 200 11 725 2 933 402 19 721 96 517 4 080
CG 84 228 675 600 6 900 1 900 094 29 912 93 355 3 895
Inclusion criteria >=15 years IG- late-stage OC
CG- healthy individuals residing withing 200 m of the matched OC case
>=30 years with risk factors (tobacco use) >=18 years with risk factors (tobacco use) >=40 years >=35 years >=15 years with risk factors (tobacco use)
Compliance with intervention Males- 11.9 % − 20.1 % Females- 19.9 % − 26.8 % Not reported Not reported 55 % Not reported IG- 92 %
CG for 1 round of screening- 46 %
77.60 %
Intervention period reported IG 1984–1990 1 January 1994 – 17 July 1997 2008–2015 2004–2012 1992–2018 1996–2008 January 2000- December 2000
CG 1984–1990 1 January 1994 – 17 July1997 2008–2015 2004–2012 2006–2018 Routine care-1996–2005
Screened from 2006 to 2008
January 2000- December 2000
Number of screening rounds IG Not reported 0–2 1 -more than 3 3 1–3 times per year 1–4 1
CG Not reported 0–2 0 0 Annually or as required 0–1 1
Follow up for screen positive cases- definition Referral to a specialist surgeon or oncologist Referral to a specialist surgeon or oncologist Referral to a specialist surgeon or oncologist Referral to a specialist surgeon or oncologist Referral to a specialist surgeon or oncologist Referral to a specialist surgeon or oncologist Referral to a specialist surgeon or oncologist
Follow up compliance rate 25–34 % Not reported Not reported 91.10 % Not reported 59 % IG- 82.3 % CG- 91 %