Table 6.
Comparing our series with the literature for the Lysholm, Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee scores
|
Ref.
|
N
|
Years
|
F-up in yr
|
RTS
|
IKDC
|
Lysholm
|
Tegner
|
KT-1000, mm ± SD
|
KOOS
|
| Battaglia et al[28], 2007 | 63 | 31 | 6.1 | 42 (66%) same level | G/E 36%; P 17%; F 11% | - | - | < 3 | - |
| Diamantopoulos et al[29], 2008 | 107 | 39 | 6 | 39 (36%) same level | G/E 57%; P 34%; F 7% | 88.5 ± 12.4 | 6.3 ± 1.8 | 0.93 ± 1.15 | - |
| Gifstad et al[30], 2013 | 56 | 26 | 7.5 | 7 (13%) same level | - | 80 ± 15 | 6 ± 4 | 3.3 ± 2.7 | 70 ± 21 |
| Shelbourne et al[31], 2014 | 259 | 22 | 7.2 | 178 (68%) same level | Subjective 76 ± 18.3 | - | - | 2.3 ± 1.7 | - |
| Ortiz et al, 2022 | 41 | 29 | 5.8 | 61% same level & 39% lower level | G/E 43%; P 53%; F 4% | 89 ± 8 | 5.6 ± 1.6 | 3 ± 1.2 | - |
N: Number of patients; F-up: Follow up; RTS: Return to sport; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; G/E: Good to excellent; P: Poor; F: Fair; SD: Standard deviation; KOOS: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.