Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 18;13(9):802–811. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.802

Table 2.

Radiographic parameter comparison between below-elbow cast and above-elbow cast at baseline (post reduction) and at final control

Parameter
Group A (BEC), mean (95%CI)
Group B (AEC), mean (95%CI)
t -test (t) comparing groups
P value
Baseline (post reduction)
RL 11.31 mm (11.03; 11.60) 11.35 mm (11.05; 11.64) t = -0.17 P = 0.86
RI 20.90° (20.41; 21.39) 21.08° (20.58; 21.59) t = -0.50 P = 0.62
VT -8.06° (-9.11; -7.01) -6.55° (-7.56; -5.55) t = -2.05 P = 0.04
Final control (35 d)
RL 9.73 mm (9.33; 10.12) 9.72 mm (9.35; 10.09) t = 0.02 P = 0.99
RI 18.07° (17.42; 18.72) 18.54° (17.88; 19.19) t = -1.01 P = 0.31
VT -3.95° (-5.61; -2.29) -3.03° (-4,35; -1,71) t = -0.86 P = 0.39
Δ final control–baseline
Parameter
RL -1.59 mm (-1.88; -1.29) -1.63 mm (-1.89; -1.36) t = 0.2 P = 0.84
RI -2.83° (-3.37; -2.29) -2.54° (-3.05; -2.03) t = -0.77 P = 0.44
VT 4.11° (2.61; 5.61) 3.53° (2.22; 4.83) t = 0.58 P = 0.56
Δ of loss of radiographic parameters during treatment (BEC–AEC)
Parameter Group A-B, mean (95%CI)
RL 0.04 mm (-0.36; 0.44)
RI -0.29° (-1.03; 0.45)
VT 0.59° (-1.39; 2.57)

BEC: Below elbow cast; AEC: Above elbow cast; RL: Radial length; RI: Radial inclination; VT: Volar tilt.