Table 2.
ICF uses in clinical settings.
Country | * Assessment Instruments |
Rehabilitation and Outcome Evaluation | Oral Health | Rare Diseases |
Registration of Data of Care | Municipality Health Care | ** Social Care | Reference Model to Assess Functioning | Assessment of Workability | Summary Use by Country |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Germany | √ | 11% | ||||||||
France | √ | √ | √ | 33% | ||||||
Denmark | √ | √ | √ | 33% | ||||||
Sweden | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 78% | ||
Italy | √ | √ | √ | 33% | ||||||
The Netherlands | √ | √ | 22% | |||||||
Finland | √ | √ | √ | √ | 44% | |||||
Australia | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 56% | ||||
South Africa | √ | √ | √ | 33% | ||||||
South Korea | √ | 11% | ||||||||
Japan | √ | 11% | ||||||||
Russia | √ | √ | √ | √ | 44% | |||||
Czech Republic | √ | √ | 22% | |||||||
Canada | √ | 11% | ||||||||
Summary use by area | 64% | 79% | 14% | 7% | 21% | 7% | 21% | 50% | 21% | – |
Note. * ICF was used as needs or functioning assessment instrument. ** For elderly and persons with disabilities.