Abstract
This study investigated the short-term (in 2020) and long-term (in 2021) impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide-related characteristics in Korean adolescents in comparison with the pre-pandemic period (in 2019) and examined the factors associated with those impacts. Secondary data of the cross-sectional 15th–17th (2019–2021) Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey targeting adolescents in school were utilized. The proportions of adolescents with depression, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts were 26.5%, 12.2%, 3.7%, and 2.4%, respectively. Following an adjustment, depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts significantly improved in the short term and depression and suicide attempts improved significantly in the long term (i.e., 2021), albeit to a lesser degree. The associated variables in the short-term analysis (i.e., 2020) reflected the socioeconomic vulnerabilities (e.g., lower household socioeconomic status [SES], unhealthy status, and unhealthy behaviors), as well as the socioeconomically favorable indicators (e.g., high household SES and high academic achievement). In the long-term, suicidal ideation was no longer associated with a lack of engagement in hand washing, and suicide attempts were no longer associated with the amount of internet time used for studying. For a successful suicide prevention, it is necessary to develop in-school interventions that address the relevant factors identified in this study and the community-based interventions that target out-of-school adolescents.
Keywords: COVID-19, adolescents, depression, suicide, Korea
1. Introduction
Suicide has an immense burden on global public health. Suicide is a particularly serious problem among adolescents, as it was the third leading cause of death among 10- to 19-year-olds globally as of 2015 [1]. In addition, the suicide rate of South Korean adolescents was the fourth-highest among the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, and it consistently increased through 2019 [2]. Following the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was first reported at the end of 2019, quarantine policies, such as school closures, as part of the social distancing policies, commenced; in 2020 and 2021, these policies socially isolated adolescents and led them to worry about illness and the economic impacts on their families [3,4]. This has caused health workers to be concerned about mental health among adolescents, as a vulnerable population.
Depression is one of the strongest predictors of suicidal ideation, but not necessarily of suicide attempts [5]. Furthermore, the development of suicidal ideation and the progression from ideation to suicide attempts are distinct phenomena, as demonstrated by the ideation-to-action framework [5]. Therefore, these psychological variables both need to be examined in order to prevent suicide. However, according to review studies on depression among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic, most studies showed that depression among adolescents worsened in 2020 after the outbreak of COVID-19 [4,6]. Although contradictory results were found, as a few studies reported improvements [7,8]. Furthermore, a review [9] on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts demonstrated that among all six studies on suicidal ideation, only three reported increased estimates of suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, China, and the United States. Suicide planning and attempts were hardly found [10], and inconsistent suicide rates in 2020 have been reported in different countries [2].
The diversity of these study results could be attributed to the differences among the studies in the measurement time and countries, as well as the aspects of the study methods, such as study sampling and measurement tools [11,12]. In a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies of predominantly European and North American adults, the worst mental health was found in the early stages of the pandemic (March to April 2020), whereas improvements were found later in the same year. The psychological adaptation and resilience in the later stage would be attributed to the fact that those findings were reported during a later stage of the pandemic [12]. Furthermore, countries have distinctive characteristics in terms of socioeconomic factors, health status, healthy lifestyles, and health care services, all of which are associated with mental health [11].
Therefore, in order to derive reliable results regarding the suicide-related characteristics of adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study analyzed the representative data from Korean adolescents before the pandemic (in 2019), in the short-term period after the start of the pandemic (2020), and in the long-term period of the pandemic (in 2021). The variables that influenced suicidality among adolescents were also considered. The results of this study will contribute basic data to produce policies helping to prevent adolescent suicide.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
This study is a secondary analysis using raw data from the 15th (2019), 16th (2020), and 17th (2021) Youth Health Behavior Online Survey (KYRBS) to identify differences in the suicide-related characteristics of adolescents in Korea before (2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic, in the short term (2020) and long term (2021).
2.2. Participants
The KYRBS data provided by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) were analyzed in order to obtain insights into the status of the health behavior of young people in the Republic of Korea, to calculate the health indicators necessary for the planning and evaluation of youth health promotion projects, and to facilitate quantitative comparisons of youth health indicators between countries. The KYRBS was officially approved by the Statistics Korea, and the Institutional Review Board of the KDCA has waived the need for the KYRBS’s ethics approval under the Bioethics & Safety Act, and it has been made available to the public online. All study participants completed the survey using a computer under the condition of anonymity. The KYRBS is a cross-sectional study conducted annually with students aged 12–18 years at 400 middle schools and 400 high schools, using a multi-stage cluster sampling design to acquire the representative data [13]. As the sampling frame for the sample design, data from middle and high schools nationwide as of April 2019, April 2020, and April 2021 were used. The sampling consisted of three steps: population stratification, sample allocation, and sampling. In the population stratification stage, in order to minimize the sampling error, the regional group and school level were used as stratification variables. In the sample allocation step, the proportional distribution method was applied to ensure that the population composition ratio for each stratified variable and the sample composition ratio were consistent. Stratified cluster sampling was used, and the primary sampling unit was a school and the secondary sampling unit was a class. The 2019 KYRBS was conducted from June to July 2019, and 57,303 students participated in the study. The 2020 KYRBS was conducted from August to November 2020, and 54,948 students participated. The 2021 KYRBS was conducted from August to November 2021, and 54,848 students participated. Therefore, among the 167,099 respondents from the three years (2019–2021), the data from 159,189 students were analyzed, with the exclusion of 7910 respondents with missing responses on the suicide-related variables. More detailed material on the data, data collection, and the survey procedure is available online (https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/main.do) (accessed on 3 June 2022).
2.3. Outcomes and Covariates
As suicide-related variables, depression, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempt were analyzed. Depression was assessed based on the participants’ experience of depressive mood through the question “During the last 12 months, have you ever had enough sad or desperate times to stop your daily activities for two weeks?” The experience of a depressive mood persisting for more than two weeks is one of the core symptoms of a major depressive disorder, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth Edition (DSM-V), and it is also used as a screening question [14,15]. Suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts were assessed by questions asking whether suicidal thoughts, suicide planning, and suicide attempts had occurred in the past 12 months (with answers of yes or no).
As independent variables, general and health-related characteristics were included. Data on the following general characteristics were analyzed: age, school type (middle school, high school), sex, academic achievement, type of residence, and household socioeconomic status (SES). Academic achievement and household socioeconomic status (SES) were assessed by self-reported responses and reclassified as high (high or high middle), middle, and low (middle low or low). The type of residence was categorized according to whether the participants lived with family (yes or no).
Several health-related characteristics were analyzed, as follows: subjective health status, perceived body image, and health behaviors including breakfast skipping, physical activity, internet usage time for study and leisure, obesity, personal hygiene, current smoking, and current drinking. The subjective health status and perceived body image were subjectively evaluated by the respondents, whose responses were reclassified into healthy (very healthy or healthy), average, and unhealthy (unhealthy or very unhealthy), and thin (very thin or thin), average, and fat (fat or very fat). The participants reported the frequency of their breakfast consumption and the number of days of physical activity in the preceding seven days. Breakfast skipping was reclassified as having eaten breakfast on five days or less and having eaten breakfast on more than five days, except for those who consumed only milk or juice for breakfast in the last seven days. The responses on physical activity were recategorized as engaging in physical activity on three or more days or on less than three days in the last seven days, in which their heart rate was higher than usual or whether they engaged in 60 min or more of physical activity that left them breathless, regardless of the type of physical activity. Internet usage time was assessed in terms of how many hours per day on average the participants used the internet for study or leisure in the last seven days. According to the Korean Obesity Society’s Obesity Treatment Guidelines [16], based on the 2017 standard growth chart for children and adolescents, the body mass index was classified as indicating underweight, normal, overweight, and obese if it was less than in the 5th percentile, from the 5th percentile to less than in the 85th percentile, from the 85th percentile to less than in the 95th percentile, and in the 95th or above percentile, respectively. Personal hygiene was measured by how often hands were washed with soap in the past seven days, with a total possible score of 20 points (before meals in school, after using the bathroom in school, before meals at home, after using the bathroom at home, and after coming home, with responses of “always”, “mostly”, “sometimes”, and “never” that corresponded to scores of 1 through 4), and responses were reclassified as a total score of 10 or higher or less than 10. Current smoking was assessed by whether participants had smoked more than one cigarette a day in the last 30 days (yes or no), and current drinking was assessed by whether participants had drunk more than one drink in the last 30 days (yes or no).
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The KYRBS used a stratified multi-stage cluster-sampling design to provide the representative estimates of the Korean population. The complex sample frequency analysis was performed to calculate the unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages, and the estimated mean and standard error were calculated using a complex-sample descriptive statistical analysis. The general and health-related characteristics were analyzed through a combined sample frequency analysis by year and a complex-sample descriptive statistical analysis. The yearly differences in depression, suicidal ideation, suicide planning and suicide attempts were tested using the Rao–Scott test. The differences in depression, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide plans according to general and health-related characteristics, were analyzed with the Rao–Scott test and the combined-sample t-test. The impacts of the year and the general and health-related characteristics on depression, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts were analyzed in a complex sample using the logistic regression in comparison with 2019. The statistical analysis used SPSS version 23.0, with a significance level of 5%.
3. Results
3.1. General and Health-Related Characteristics
The general and health-related characteristics of the study population according to the survey years from 2019–2021 are presented in Table 1. This study population was about 15 years old on average and contained more boys than girls. The following characteristics predominated: a low level of academic achievement, living with family, residing in a middle-SES household, being healthy, and perceiving their bodies as fat. Regarding the health behaviors, 20.6% skipped breakfast, 14.4% engaged in physical activity, the average internet use time was 448.74 min for study and 201.53 min for leisure, 9.8% were overweight and 12.3% were obese, 37.3% had a score of at least 10 for personal hygiene, 5.5% smoked, and 11.8% drank alcohol.
Table 1.
General and health-related characteristics of the subjects (N = 167,099), n (%).
| Variables | Total | 2019 (n = 57,303) |
2020 (n = 54,948) |
2021 (n = 54,848) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) | 15.16 ± 0.01 | 15.08 ± 0.02 | 15.19 ± 0.02 | 15.23 ± 0.02 | |
| School type | Middle school | 88,360 (49.5) | 29,384 (47.9) | 28,961 (49.6) | 30,015 (51.0) |
| High school | 78,739 (50.5) | 27,919 (52.1) | 25,987 (50.4) | 24,833 (49.0) | |
| Gender | Male | 82,679 (51.9) | 28,084 (51.8) | 27,199 (52.0) | 27,396 (51.9) |
| Female | 76,510 (48.1) | 25,964 (48.2) | 25,295 (48.0) | 5251 (48.1) | |
| Residence with family | Yes | 151,755 (96.1) | 51,288 (95.6) | 50,060 (96.3) | 50,407 (96.4) |
| No | 7434 (3.9) | 2760 (4.4) | 23,434 (3.7) | 2240 (3.6) | |
| Household SES | Low | 19,375 (11.8) | 6800 (12.3) | 3 (12.3) | 5822 (10.7) |
| Middle | 77,333 (48.2) | 26,049 (48.0) | 25,243 (47.6) | 26,041 (49.1) | |
| High | 62,481 (40.0) | 21,199 (39.6) | 20,498 (40.0) | 20,784 (40.3) | |
| Subjective health status | Healthy | 109,574 (68.5) | 38,226 (70.4) | 36,961 (70.0) | 34,387 (65.2) |
| Average | 37,305 (23.6) | 11,985 (22.4) | 11,708 (22.5) | 13,612 (25.9) | |
| Unhealthy | 12,310 (7.9) | 3837 (7.2) | 3825 (7.5) | 4648 (9.0) | |
| Perceived body image | Thin | 40,302 (25.5) | 13,896 (25.8) | 12,904 (24.7) | 13,502 (25.8) |
| Average | 58,291 (36.6) | 19,873 (36.6) | 19,342 (36.9) | 19,076 (36.3) | |
| Fat | 60,596 (37.9) | 20,279 (37.6) | 20,248 (38.4) | 20,069 (37.8) | |
| Breakfast skipping | Yes | 32,963 (20.6) | 10,724 (19.8) | 10,883 (20.5) | 11,356 (21.4) |
| No | 126,226 (79.4) | 43,324 (80.2) | 41,611 (79.5) | 41,291 (79.9) | |
| Physical activity | Yes | 24,035 (14.4) | 8249 (14.6) | 7761 (14.0) | 8025 (14.6) |
| No | 135,154 (85.6) | 45,799 (85.4) | 44,733 (86.0) | 44,622 (85.4) | |
| Internet use time for study | (min) | 448.74 ± 1.51 | 468.66 ± 2.72 | 417.30 ± 2.71 | 460.11 ± 2.34 |
| Internet use time for leisure | (min) | 201.53 ± 0.64 | 166.64 ± 0.83 | 229.37 ± 1.21 | 208.76 ± 1.00 |
| Personal hygiene | Yes | 59,942 (37.3) | 24,599 (45.3) | 16,843 (31.9) | 18,500 (34.7) |
| No | 99,247 (62.7) | 29,449 (54.7) | 35,651 (68.1) | 34,147 (65.3) | |
| Current smoking | Yes | 8622 (5.5) | 3590 (6.9) | 2476 (4.7) | 2556 (5.0) |
| No | 150,567 (94.5) | 50,458 (93.1) | 50,018 (95.3) | 50,091 (95.0) | |
| Current drinking consumption | Yes | 18,661 (11.8) | 7694 (14.6) | 5515 (10.5) | 5452 (10.5) |
| no | 140,528 (88.2) | 46,354 (85.4) | 46,979 (89.5) | 47,195 (89.5) |
Unweighted frequency (weighted %), estimated mean ± standardized.
3.2. Suicide-Related Characteristics and Their Differences from 2019 to 2021
The suicide-related characteristics and their differences from 2019 to 2021 are presented in Table 2. Depression was present among 26.5% of this study population, and 12.2%, 3.7%, and 2.4% reported suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts, respectively. Compared with 2019, in 2020 depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts showed significant improvements, but suicide planning showed no significant differences, and in 2021, depression and suicide attempts showed significant differences by improving, but suicidal ideation no longer showed any significant differences.
Table 2.
Suicide-related characteristics from 2019 to 2021. n (%).
| Variables | Total | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | 56,794 (26.5) | 14,949 (27.9) | 13,100 (25.0) *** | 13,933 (26.4) *** |
| Suicidal ideation | 26,207 (12.2) | 6871 (12.7) | 5619 (10.7) *** | 6535 (12.4) |
| Suicide planning | 8116 (3.7) | 2000 (3.6) | 1794 (3.4) | 2010 (3.8) |
| Suicide attempt | 5208 (2.4) | 1474 (2.6) | 1007 (1.9) *** | 1125 (2.1) *** |
vs. 2019. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
3.3. Differences from 2019 to 2021 in the Suicide-Related Variables and the Associated Factors
The statistical differences in the general and health-related characteristics according to the suicide-related variables are represented in Table 3. The 2020 and 2021 suicide-related variables, the general and health-related variables, and the relationships among those variables, in comparison with the data from 2019, are presented in Table 4 and Table 5, respectively. Following an adjustment for the general and health-related characteristics, compared with 2019, significant improvements were found in depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts (odds ratio [OR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85–0.91, p < 0.001, OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81–0.90, p < 0.001, and OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.67–0.82, p < 0.001, respectively). In 2021, these improvements were sustained for depression and suicide attempts, albeit to a lesser degree (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.88–0.95, p < 0.001, and OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.72–0.87, p < 0.001, respectively).
Table 3.
General and health-related characteristics according to the suicide-related characteristics (N = 159,189).
| Variables | Depression | Suicidal Ideation | Suicide Planning | Suicide Attempt | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) or M ± SE | χ2 or t (p) | n (%) or M ± SE | χ2 or t (p) | n (%) or M ± SE | χ2 or t (p) | n (%) or M ± SE | χ2 or t (p) | ||
| Age | 15.20 ± 0.01 | 12.114 *** | 15.15± 0.02 | −1.751 | 15.09 ± 0.02 | 6.138 *** | 15.05 ± 0.02 | 6.545 *** | |
| School type | Middle school | 21,112 (25.0) | 167.779 *** | 10,380 (12.3) | 22.549 *** | 3384 (4.0) | 71.180 *** | 2164 (2.5) | 66.264 *** |
| High school | 20,870 (27.8) | 8645 (11.6) | 2420 (3.2) | 1442 (1.9) | |||||
| Gender | Male | 17,407 (21.3) | 2321.949 *** | 7077 (8.7) | 1678.741 *** | 2267 (2.8) | 335.735 *** | 1181 (1.4) | 478.973 *** |
| Female | 24,575 (31.9) | 11,948 (15.4) | 3537 (4.5) | 2425 (3.0) | |||||
| Academic achievement | Low | 16,068 (31.7) | 1134.870 *** | 7518 (14.7) | 542.260 *** | 2403 (4.7) | 248.651 *** | 1638 (3.1) | 317.297 *** |
| Middle | 12,038 (25.0) | 5184 (10.7) | 1535 (3.2) | 935 (1.9) | |||||
| High | 13,876 (23.0) | 6323 (10.6) | 1866 (3.1) | 1033 (1.6) | |||||
| Residence with family | Yes | 39,715 (26.3) | 52.684 *** | 17,915 (11.8) | 79.998 *** | 5402 (3.5) | 78.463 *** | 3341 (2.1) | 64.275 *** |
| No | 2267 (30.4) | 1110 (15.6) | 402 (5.7) | 265 (3.7) | |||||
| Household SES | Low | 7092 (36.5) | 1109.454 *** | 3937 (20.2) | 1378.292 *** | 1340 (6.9) | 647.865 *** | 924 (4.6) | 550.663 *** |
| Middle | 19,484 (25.4) | 8577 (11.2) | 2448 (3.1) | 1483 (1.9) | |||||
| High | 15,406 (24.7) | 6511 (10.5) | 2016 (3.2) | 1199 (1.9) | |||||
| Subjective health status | Healthy | 23,836 (21.8) | 4630.806 *** | 9253 (8.5) | 5543.276 *** | 2636 (2.4) | 2321.515 *** | 1583 (1.4) | 1428.590 *** |
| Average | 12,421 (33.1) | 6143 (16.3) | 1834 (4.8) | 1215 (3.1) | |||||
| Unhealthy | 5725 (46.4) | 3629 (29.4) | 1334 (10.5) | 808 (6.3) | |||||
| Perceived body image | Thin | 10,423 (25.9) | 163.435 *** | 4539 (11.4) | 383.956 *** | 1327 (3.3) | 120.453 *** | 799 (1.9) | 77.723 *** |
| Average | 14,527 (24.9) | 6043 (10.3) | 1854 (3.2) | 1175 (1.9) | |||||
| Fat | 17,032 (28.2) | 8443 (13.9) | 2623 (4.3) | 1632 (2.6) | |||||
| Breakfast skipping | Yes | 9751 (29.6) | 211.343 *** | 4574 (13.8) | 132.457 *** | 1485 (4.5) | 94.112 *** | 977 (2.9) | 94.572 *** |
| No | 32,231 (25.6) | 14,451 (11.5) | 4319 (3.4) | 2629 (2.0) | |||||
| Physical activity | Yes | 6452 (26.9) | 3.357 | 2636 (11.2) | 12.595 *** | 914 (3.8) | 2.578 | 596 (2.5) | 13.104 ** |
| No | 35,530 (26.3) | 16,389 (12.1) | 4890 (3.6) | 3010 (2.1) | |||||
| Internet use time for study (min) | 451.65 ± 1.55 | 7.392 *** | 455.69 ± 1.71 | 8.240 *** | 451.21 ± 2.39 | 1.346 | 444.76 ± 2.69 | 1.743 | |
| Internet use time for leisure (min) | 208.72 ± 0.99 | 9.452 *** | 212.01 ± 1.41 | 8.254 *** | 218.33 ± 2.49 | 6.875 *** | 219.79 ± 3.27 | 5.676 *** | |
| Obesity (BMI) | Underweight | 3140 (26.0) | 23.085 *** | 1423 (11.7) | 50.173 *** | 436 (3.6) | 23.566 *** | 259 (2.1) | 2.395 |
| Normal | 29,673 (26.8) | 13,005 (11.7) | 3909 (3.5) | 2489 (2.2) | |||||
| Overweight | 4059 (25.4) | 1937 (12.1) | 630 (3.9) | 378 (2.3) | |||||
| Obese | 5110 (25.6) | 2660 (13.5) | 829 (4.1) | 480 (2.3) | |||||
| Personal hygiene | Yes | 25,596 (25.9) | 43.109 *** | 11,212 (11.3) | 109.896 *** | 3540 (3.5) | 6.482 * | 2130 (2.1) | 15.406 *** |
| No | 16,386 (27.4) | 7813 (13.1) | 2264 (3.8) | 1476 (2.4) | |||||
| Current smoking | Yes | 3767 (43.0) | 1311.048 *** | 1950 (22.0) | 895.837 *** | 743 (8.3) | 576.287 *** | 642 (7.0) | 1004.595 *** |
| No | 38,215 (25.5) | 17,075 (11.4) | 5061 (3.3) | 2964 (1.9) | |||||
| Current drinking consumption | Yes | 7541 (40.3) | 2127.632 *** | 3687 (19.7) | 1206.280 *** | 1333 (7.0) | 699.159 *** | 1023 (5.3) | 938.125 *** |
| no | 34,441 (24.5) | 15,338 (10.9) | 4471 (3.2) | 2583 (1.8) | |||||
*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Table 4.
Changes between 2019 and 2020 in the relationships of the general and health related characteristics with the suicide-related characteristics.
| Depression | Suicidal Ideation | Suicide Planning | Suicide Attempt | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |
| Year 2020 vs. 2019 | 0.88 | 0.85~0.91 | <0.001 | 0.86 | 0.81~0.90 | <0.001 | 0.97 | 0.89~1.05 | 0.454 | 0.74 | 0.67~0.82 | <0.001 |
| Age | 1.04 | 1.02~1.06 | <0.001 | 0.98 | 0.95~1.00 | 0.066 | 0.95 | 0.91~0.99 | 0.007 | 0.91 | 0.86~0.95 | <0.001 |
| School type High vs. middle | 0.86 | 0.81~0.92 | <0.001 | 0.74 | 0.68~0.81 | <0.001 | 0.65 | 0.56~0.75 | <0.001 | 0.61 | 0.51~0.74 | <0.001 |
| Gender Female vs. male | 1.86 | 1.79~1.93 | <0.001 | 1.92 | 1.82~2.02 | <0.001 | 1.65 | 1.27~1.80 | <0.001 | 2.44 | 2.20~2.71 | <0.001 |
| Academic achievement Middle vs. low | 1.07 | 1.03~1.12 | <0.001 | 0.99 | 0.94~1.05 | 0.725 | 1.03 | 0.93~1.13 | 0.621 | 1.15 | 1.02~1.29 | 0.024 |
| High vs. low | 1.32 | 1.26~1.37 | <0.001 | 1.22 | 1.15~1.28 | <0.001 | 1.30 | 1.18~1.43 | <0.001 | 1.49 | 1.32~1.67 | <0.001 |
| Living with family Yes vs. no | 0.87 | 0.80~0.94 | <0.001 | 0.75 | 0.68~0.83 | <0.001 | 0.60 | 0.51~0.70 | <0.001 | 0.52 | 0.48~0.70 | <0.001 |
| Household SES Middle vs. low | 0.91 | 0.87~0.94 | <0.001 | 0.96 | 0.91~1.01 | 0.093 | 0.88 | 0.81~0.96 | 0.004 | 0.86 | 0.77~0.95 | 0.005 |
| High vs. low | 1.34 | 1.27~1.41 | <0.001 | 1.66 | 1.56~1.77 | <0.001 | 1.61 | 1.45~1.80 | <0.001 | 1.68 | 1.47~1.91 | <0.001 |
| Subjective health status Average vs. healthy | 1.66 | 1.60~1.72 | <0.001 | 1.90 | 1.81~1.99 | <0.001 | 1.87 | 1.72~2.04 | <0.001 | 1.95 | 1.75~2.17 | <0.001 |
| Unhealthy vs. healthy | 2.82 | 2.67~2.98 | <0.001 | 3.93 | 3.68~4.19 | <0.001 | 4.12 | 3.73~4.54 | <0.001 | 4.13 | 3.66~4.66 | <0.001 |
| Perceived body image Average vs. thin | 0.90 | 0.87~0.95 | <0.001 | 0.92 | 0.86~0.97 | 0.006 | 1.01 | 0.91~1.12 | 0.878 | 0.94 | 0.83~1.07 | 0.379 |
| Fat vs. thin | 1.04 | 0.99~1.09 | 0.105 | 1.13 | 1.06~1.22 | 0.001 | 1.23 | 1.09~1.37 | 0.001 | 1.25 | 1.08~1.44 | <0.001 |
| Breakfast skipping Yes vs. no | 1.12 | 1.08~1.16 | <0.001 | 1.10 | 1.05~1.16 | <0.001 | 1.16 | 1.07~1.26 | <0.001 | 1.22 | 1.10~1.34 | <0.001 |
| Physical activity Yes vs. no | 1.29 | 1.24~1.35 | <0.001 | 1.19 | 1.12~1.27 | <0.001 | 1.24 | 1.11~1.38 | <0.001 | 1.49 | 1.32~1.69 | <.001 |
| Internet use time for study (min) | 1.01 | 1.01~1.02 | <0.001 | 1.02 | 1.02~1.03 | <0.001 | 1.02 | 1.01~1.03 | 0.003 | 1.00 | 0.99~1.01 | 0.879 |
| Internet use time for leisure (min) | 1.01 | 1.01~1.02 | <0.001 | 1.02 | 1.01~1.02 | <0.001 | 1.02 | 1.00~1.03 | 0.012 | 1.02 | 1.00~1.04 | 0.040 |
| BMI Normal vs. underweight | 1.14 | 1.06~1.22 | <0.001 | 1.07 | 0.98~1.18 | 0.132 | 1.04 | 0.89~1.22 | 0.621 | 1.10 | 0.90~1.34 | 0.343 |
| Overweight vs. underweight | 1.01 | 0.92~1.11 | 0.080 | 1.02 | 0.90~1.15 | 0.738 | 1.03 | 0.84~1.26 | 0.778 | 1.03 | 0.80~1.32 | 0.824 |
| Obese vs. underweight | 0.94 | 0.87~1.03 | 0.190 | 1.07 | 0.95~1.20 | 0.283 | 1.01 | 0.82~1.23 | 0.958 | 1.01 | 0.79~1.30 | 0.942 |
| Personal hygiene Yes vs. no | 1.02 | 0.98~1.05 | 0.316 | 1.09 | 1.04~1.14 | <0.001 | 0.99 | 0.92~1.07 | 0.829 | 0.99 | 0.90~1.08 | 0.763 |
| Smoking Yes vs. no | 1.66 | 1.55~1.79 | <0.001 | 1.79 | 1.64~1.96 | <0.001 | 1.99 | 1.74~2.29 | <0.001 | 2.87 | 2.46~3.36 | <0.001 |
| Drinking consumption Yes vs. no | 1.78 | 1.69~1.87 | <0.001 | 1.81 | 1.69~1.93 | <0.001 | 1.89 | 1.70~2.10 | <0.001 | 2.31 | 2.04~2.63 | <0.001 |
BMI: Body mass index.
Table 5.
Changes between 2019 and 2021 in the relationships of the general and health-related characteristics with the suicide-related characteristics.
| Depression | Suicidal Ideation | Suicide Planning | Suicide Attempt | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |
| Year 2021 vs. 2019 | 0.91 | 0.88~0.95 | <0.001 | 0.96 | 0.92~1.01 | 0.102 | 1.04 | 0.96~1.12 | 0.336 | 0.80 | 0.72~0.87 | <0.001 |
| Age | 1.03 | 1.01~1.05 | 0.001 | 0.96 | 0.94~0.98 | <0.001 | 0.91 | 0.88~0.95 | <0.001 | 0.87 | 0.83~0.92 | <0.001 |
| School type High vs. middle | 0.83 | 0.78~0.88 | <0.001 | 0.71 | 0.65~0.77 | <0.001 | 0.68 | 0.59~0.78 | <0.001 | 0.64 | 0.54~0.76 | <0.001 |
| Gender Female vs. male | 1.76 | 1.70~1.82 | <0.001 | 1.94 | 1.85~2.03 | <0.001 | 1.65 | 1.52~1.79 | <0.001 | 2.30 | 2.08~2.54 | <0.001 |
| Academic achievement Middle vs. low | 1.09 | 1.05~1.13 | <0.001 | 1.01 | 0.96~1.07 | 0.661 | 0.99 | 0.90~1.09 | 0.870 | 1.14 | 1.02~1.28 | 0.024 |
| High vs. low | 1.34 | 1.29~1.40 | <0.001 | 1.18 | 1.12~1.25 | <0.001 | 1.15 | 1.05~1.26 | 0.003 | 1.40 | 1.22~1.58 | <0.001 |
| Living with family Yes vs. no | 0.83 | 0.77~0.89 | <0.001 | 0.68 | 0.62~0.76 | <0.001 | 0.54 | 0.47~0.64 | <0.001 | 0.52 | 0.44~0.63 | <0.001 |
| Household SES Middle vs. low | 0.88 | 0.85~0.92 | <0.001 | 0.96 | 0.91~1.01 | 0.097 | 0.89 | 0.81~0.96 | 0.004 | 0.86 | 0.78~0.96 | 0.006 |
| High vs. low | 1.31 | 1.24~1.38 | <0.001 | 1.68 | 1.57~1.79 | <0.001 | 1.72 | 1.55~1.91 | <0.001 | 1.79 | 1.58~2.02 | <0.001 |
| Subjective health status Average vs. unhealthy | 1.70 | 1.64~1.76 | <0.001 | 1.94 | 1.86~2.03 | <0.001 | 1.94 | 1.78~2.10 | <0.001 | 1.96 | 1.77~2.17 | <0.001 |
| Unhealthy vs. healthy | 2.83 | 2.69~2.98 | <0.001 | 4.07 | 3.82~4.33 | <0.001 | 4.35 | 3.96~4.79 | <0.001 | 3.94 | 3.50~4.44 | <0.001 |
| Perceived body image Average vs. thin | 0.91 | 0.87~0.95 | <0.001 | 0.89 | 0.84~0.95 | <0.001 | 1.04 | 0.93~1.16 | 0.514 | 1.06 | 0.92~1.21 | 0.435 |
| Fat vs. thin | 1.05 | 1.00~1.11 | 0.056 | 1.11 | 1.03~1.19 | 0.004 | 1.15 | 1.03~1.29 | 0.018 | 1.21 | 1.04~1.41 | 0.012 |
| Breakfast skipping Yes vs. no | 1.11 | 1.07~1.16 | <0.001 | 1.12 | 1.07~1.18 | <0.001 | 1.20 | 1.11~1.30 | <0.001 | 1.28 | 1.16~1.40 | <0.001 |
| Physical activity Yes vs. no | 1.31 | 1.25~1.37 | <0.001 | 1.24 | 1.17~1.32 | <0.001 | 1.36 | 1.23~1.50 | <0.001 | 1.48 | 1.31~1.68 | <0.001 |
| Internet use time for study (min) | 1.01 | 1.00~1.01 | <0.001 | 1.02 | 1.01~1.02 | <0.001 | 1.01 | 1.00~1.02 | <0.001 | 1.00 | 0.99~1.02 | 0.621 |
| Internet use time for leisure (min) | 1.02 | 1.01~1.02 | <0.001 | 1.02 | 1.01~1.03 | <0.001 | 1.03 | 1.01~1.04 | <0.001 | 1.01 | 0.99~1.03 | 0.237 |
| BMI Normal vs. underweight | 1.12 | 1.05~1.20 | 0.001 | 1.08 | 0.98~1.18 | 0.105 | 0.91 | 0.78~1.06 | 0.204 | 0.98 | 0.80~1.19 | 0.821 |
| Overweight vs. underweight | 0.97 | 0.89~1.06 | 0.530 | 1.06 | 0.94~1.20 | 0.333 | 0.96 | 0.78~1.17 | 0.651 | 0.97 | 0.75~1.25 | 0.893 |
| Obese vs. underweight | 0.91 | 0.84~0.99 | 0.027 | 1.06 | 0.94~1.19 | 0.329 | 0.92 | 0.75~1.12 | 0.393 | 0.92 | 0.71~1.19 | 0.533 |
| Personal hygiene Yes vs. no | 0.96 | 0.93~0.99 | 0.020 | 1.04 | 0.99~1.08 | 0.114 | 0.94 | 0.87~1.02 | 0.143 | 0.97 | 0.89~1.06 | 0.483 |
| Smoking Yes vs. no | 1.63 | 1.52~1.75 | <0.001 | 1.91 | 1.75~2.09 | <0.001 | 1.94 | 1.70~2.22 | <0.001 | 2.65 | 2.26~3.10 | <0.001 |
| Drinking consumption Yes vs. no | 1.80 | 1.72~1.89 | <0.001 | 1.74 | 1.64~1.86 | <0.001 | 2.11 | 1.90~2.34 | <0.001 | 2.47 | 2.18~2.81 | <0.001 |
BMI: Body mass index.
Depression was significantly associated in 2020 with older age, being in middle school, the female gender, having a middle or high academic achievement compared with a low achievement, not living with family, a low or high household SES, an average or unhealthy subjective health status compared with a healthy status, a thin or fat perceived body image compared with an average body image, skipping breakfast, engaging in physical activity, internet use time for study and leisure, being at a normal weight compared with being underweight, smoking, and alcohol drinking. The similar associations found in 2021 are all similar to that of 2020, but significantly lower odds for depression were also found among those who were obese and who did not regularly engage in personal hygiene.
Suicidal ideation showed significant associations, in 2020, with younger age, being in middle school, the female gender, having a high academic achievement compared with a low achievement, not living with family, a high household SES compared with a low SES, an average or unhealthy subjective health status compared with a healthy status, a thin or fat perceived body image compared with an average body image, skipping breakfast, engaging in physical activity, internet use time for study and leisure, engaging in personal hygiene, smoking, and alcohol drinking. The significant associations observed in 2020 were maintained in 2021, except for personal hygiene, which no longer showed a statistically significant association in the 2021 data.
Suicidal planning was significantly associated in 2020 with younger age, being in middle school, female, having a high academic achievement compared with a low achievement, not living with family, a low or high household SES compared with an average SES, an average and unhealthy subjective health status compared with healthy status, a fat perceived body image compared with an average body image, skipping breakfast, engaging in physical activity, internet use time for study and leisure, smoking, and alcohol drinking. These associations all remained consistent from 2020 to 2021.
Suicide attempts showed significant associations in 2020 with younger age, being in middle school, female, having a middle or high academic achievement compared with a low achievement, not living with family, a low or high household SES compared with an average SES, an average or unhealthy subjective health status compared with a healthy status, a fat perceived body image compared with an average body image, skipping breakfast, engaging in physical activity, internet use time for leisure, smoking, and alcohol drinking. These associations persisted in 2021, with the exception of internet use time.
4. Discussion
This study investigated the mental health status in terms of suicide-related variables and their associations with a range of variables among a representative sample of Korean adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the government implemented quarantine policies from 2020 to 2021, this study examined the short-term (6 months) and long-term (18 months) impacts of those policies. The suicide-related variables were found to improve to a greater degree in the short-term, while in the long-term, those improvements were attenuated or disappeared. Both short-term and long-term associations were found for several general characteristics (younger age, female gender, higher academic achievement, not living with family, low or high household SES) and health-related characteristics (unhealthy status, unfavorable perceived self-image, skipping breakfast, engaging in physical activity, internet use time for study and leisure, smoking, and alcohol drinking). Internet usage time for study and personal hygiene showed short-term, but no long-term associations.
In order to better understand suicidality among adolescents, this study examined depression, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts. Although direct comparisons are difficult due to the diversity among different countries, study samples, and measurement tools [11,12], it is worth noting that the proportions of depression, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts were 26.5%, 12.2%, 3.7%, and 2.4%, respectively, among this study population. The proportion of participants with depression significantly improved, to a greater extent in the short term than in the long term, compared to before the pandemic, and similar trends were found for other suicide-related variables. We attribute these phenomena to academic stress mitigation, reductions in interpersonal relationship stress, and being in a convenient and comfortable home environment. Due to the lack of preparation for online learning in school after the sudden school closures, the decrease in the number of school activities and assessments would relieve academic stress among Korean students [17]. As schools closed, the attenuated conflicts with peers and bullying in school would relieve interpersonal relationship stress [18,19]. It is also thought that the comfort of home and the financial support for study—that is, the provision of devices for distance learning by schools and local governments—and the economic support for socially and economically vulnerable groups, are likely to have been beneficial for mental health [20,21,22].
However, it should be noted that suicidal ideation worsened in the long term (i.e., 2021), again reaching levels similar to those before the onset of COVID-19. In addition, although suicide attempts improved compared to pre-COVID-19 in this study, the lack of consistent long-term improvements in suicidal ideation and suicide planning, combined with the fact that the actual acts of suicide among adolescents could not be examined in this study, there is no indication that the suicide rate has decreased [2]. Instead, according to a report presented by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in July 2021 [23], while deaths at other ages decreased, among men under the age of 30, the death rate increased through 2020, and this increase was substantially attributable to suicide due to mental health problems. In particular, among teenage males, the increase in the proportion of deaths due to suicide was the highest in 2020 compared with 2019, at 18.8%. The difference between those findings regarding the suicide rate and the results of this study can be explained by the fact that the subjects of this study were adolescents attending school, whereas the number of domestic out-of-school adolescents who did not adapt to school and therefore were vulnerable to mental health issues was 231,823 (4.1%), as of 2020 [24]. This discrepancy seems to be due to the difficulty in managing suicide in out-of-school adolescents. Therefore, a community-based suicide prevention program targeting youth is urgently needed.
Higher rates of the suicide-related variables were found among the more socioeconomically vulnerable population, as exemplified by the observed associations with younger age, being female, not residing with family, having a lower household SES, being unhealthy, and engaging in unhealthy behaviors such as having an irregular diet, inappropriate internet use, smoking, and consuming alcohol, as has been documented elsewhere [3,18,25]. However, unlike other countries, the present study found that adolescents with a high household SES and a high academic achievement would be more vulnerable to poor mental health by limited learning through online learning, as a result of their high academic enthusiasm [21]. These variables showed stronger associations with suicidal ideation during the long-term period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the perceived body image as fat was more strongly associated with mental health than with the actual body status (e.g., obesity) in this study, which seems to be because adolescents pay more attention to their appearance than to health itself [26]. Contrary to the results of other studies [25,27], adolescents who exercised were more vulnerable to poor mental health, in this study. This seems to have been due to the restrictions imposed through social distancing quarantine policies, which prevented active youth from performing as many activities as they wanted and requiring them to exercise alone and/or with a mask; however, this possibility warrants further study in the future [27]. In the long-term period of COVID-19, adolescents with suicidal ideation no longer complied as frequently with the representative quarantine guidelines such as hand washing, which were implemented in the short term. Moreover, adolescents with suicide planning and attempts were more likely to use the internet for leisure for large amounts of time rather than for study [28]. It seems that they lost interest in studying. Community health managers, school officials, and parents should work together to develop policies for interventions by understanding these suicide-related characteristics of Korean adolescents. Furthermore, future studies on the identification of the mental health status including out-of-school adolescents and the related factors are required.
This study has a few limitations. The outcome variables and covariate variables were all self-rated and constructed by a single corresponding survey question, and thus subject to measurement error [29]. Therefore, caution is needed to avoid overinterpreting the results of this study. More standardized survey tools, especially for outcome variables, need to be considered in future research. However, this study also has several strengths. First, this study presents the first comparison of long-term COVID-19 impacts on the suicide-related variables and their associations among Korean adolescents. Second, this study analyzed a nationally representative sample of Korean adolescents.
5. Conclusions
Korean adolescents’ depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts improved in the short term after COVID-19 outbreak, but these variables deteriorated somewhat or even reverted to pre-pandemic levels in the longer term, suggesting that there may be concerns about increasing the suicide rates among adolescents in the future. The associated variables were associated with socioeconomic vulnerabilities (e.g., such as younger age, female gender, not residing with family, lower household SES, unhealthy subject status, and unhealthy behaviors such as an irregular diet, inappropriate internet use, smoking, and alcohol consumption), as well as socioeconomically favorable indicators (e.g., high household SES, high academic achievement, perceived body image as average, and engaging in exercise). In the long-term period of COVID-19, suicidal ideation was no longer associated with following representative quarantine guidelines such as hand washing, and suicide attempts were no longer associated with internet usage time for study. Korea’s health policies within the education system have been relatively successful, but in order to prepare for the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic and/or outbreaks of new or modified infectious diseases in the future, as well as in order to manage mental health, including suicide, among Korean adolescents, it is necessary to implement a community-based management system for suicide-related mental health including for out-of-school adolescents in the future.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.L.; methodology, B.L.; validation, J.S.H.; data analysis, J.S.H.; data interpretation, B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L.; writing—review and editing, B.L. and J.S.H.; visualization, B.L.; supervision, J.S.H.; project administration, B.L. and J.S.H.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The KYRBS was officially approved by Statistics Korea, and the Institutional Review Board of the KDCA has waived the need for the KYRBS’s ethics approval under the Bioethics & Safety Act, and it has been made available to the public online. All study participants completed the survey using a computer under the condition of anonymity.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.World Health Organization (WHO) More than 1.2 Million Adolescents Die Every Year, Nearly All Preventable. [(accessed on 28 June 2022)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-05-2017-more-than-1-2-million-adolescents-die-every-year-nearly-all-preventable#.
- 2.Ministry of Health & Welfare White Paper on Suicide Prevention. [(accessed on 20 June 2022)];2021 Available online: http://www.mohw.go.kr/upload/viewer/skin/doc.html?fn=1625469584505_20210705161944.pdf&rs=/upload/viewer/result/202209/
- 3.Cha W.T., Joo H.J., Park Y.S., Park E.C., Kim S.Y. Depression before and during-COVID-19 by gender in the Korean population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:3477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mayne S.L., Hannan C., Davis M., Young J.F., Kelly M.K., Powell M., Dalembert G., McPeak K.E., Jenssen B.P., Fiks A.G. COVID-19 and adolescent depression and suicide risk screening outcomes. Pediatrics. 2021;148:e2021051507. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klonsky E.D., May A.M., Saffer B.Y. Suicide, suicide attempts, and suicidal ideation. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2016;12:307–330. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zolopa C., Burack J.A., O’Connor R.M., Corran C., Lai J., Bomfim E., DeGrace S., Dumont J., Larney S., Wendt D.C. Changes in youth mental health, psychological wellbeing, and substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review. Adolesc. Res. Rev. 2022;7:161–177. doi: 10.1007/s40894-022-00185-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li H.Y., Cao H., Leung D., Mak Y.W. The psychological impacts of a COVID-19 outbreak on college students in China: A longitudinal study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:3933. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xiang M., Yamamoto S., Mizoue T. Depressive symptoms in students during school closure due to COVID-19 in Shanghai. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2020;74:664–666. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oliveira J., Butini L., Pauletto P., Lehmkuhl K.M., Stefani C.M., Bolan M., Guerra E., Dick B., De Luca Canto G., Massignan C. Mental health effects prevalence in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2022;19:130–137. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bera L., Souchon M., Ladsous A., Colin V., Lopez-Castroman J. Emotional and behavioral impact of the COVID-19 epidemic in adolescents. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2022;24:37–46. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01313-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Onyeaka H., Anumudu C.K., Al-Sharify Z.T., Egele-Godswill E., Mbaegbu P. COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the global lockdown and its far-reaching effects. Sci. Prog. 2021;104:368504211019854. doi: 10.1177/00368504211019854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robinson E., Sutin A.R., Daly M., Jones A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. J. Affect. Disord. 2022;296:567–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim Y., Choi S., Chun C., Park S., Khang Y.H., Oh K. Data resource profile: The Korea youth risk behavior web-based survey (KYRBS) Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016;45:1076-1076e. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Löwe B., Kroenke K., Gräfe K. Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2) J. Psychosom. Res. 2005;58:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Williams J.W., Jr., Mulrow C.D., Kroenke K., Dhanda R., Badgett R.G., Omori D., Lee S. Case-finding for depression in primary care: A randomized trial. Am. J. Med. 1999;106:36–43. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00371-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim K.M. What makes adolescents psychologically distressed? Life events as risk factors for depression and suicide. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2021;30:359–367. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01520-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Won K.R., Lee H.J. Academic stress and suicidal ideation: The mediating effects of school connectedness, depression and anxiety in adolescents. Korean J. Youth Stud. 2019;26:79–104. doi: 10.21509/KJYS.2019.09.26.9.79. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee J., Ko Y.H., Chi S., Lee M.S., Yoon H.K. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Korean adolescents’ mental health and lifestyle factors. J. Adolesc. Health. 2022;71:270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim B.Y., Kang S.M., Kang J.H., Kang S.Y., Kim K.K., Kim K.B., Kim B., Kim S.J., Kim Y.H., Kim J.H., et al. Committee of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Korean Society for the Study of Obesity (KSSO), 2021. 2020 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guidelines for the Management of Obesity in Korea. J. Obes. Metab. Syndr. 2021;30:81–92. doi: 10.7570/jomes21022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Berger A.T., Wahlstrom K.L., Widome R. Relationships between sleep duration and adolescent depression: A conceptual replication. Sleep Health. 2019;5:175–179. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Byun S., Slavin R.E. Educational responses to the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea. [(accessed on 20 June 2022)];Best Evid. Chin. Edu. 2020 5:665–680. doi: 10.15354/bece.20.or030. doi: 10.15354/bece.20.or030. Available online: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen C., Lee S., Dong M.C., Taniguchi M. What factors drive the satisfaction of citizens with governments’ responses to COVID-19? Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;102:327–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ministry of Health & Welfare White Paper on Suicide Prevention. [(accessed on 6 September 2022)];2022 Available online: http://www.mohw.go.kr/upload/viewer/skin/doc.html?fn=1655187514592_20220614151837.pdf&rs=/upload/viewer/result/202209/
- 24.National Youth Policy Institute 2022 ISSUE Statistics No. 1 Estimation of Out-of-School Youth Size. 2022. [(accessed on 6 September 2022)]. Available online: http://ypec.re.kr/board/view?menuId=MENU00312&linkId=1637.
- 25.Samji H., Wu J., Ladak A., Vossen C., Stewart E., Dove N., Long D., Snell G. Review: Mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and youth—A systematic review. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health. 2022;27:173–189. doi: 10.1111/camh.12501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Voelker D.K., Reel J.J., Greenleaf C. Weight status and body image perceptions in adolescents: Current perspectives. Adolesc. Health Med. Ther. 2015;6:149–158. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S68344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McDowell C.P., MacDonncha C., Herring M.P. Brief report: Associations of physical activity with anxiety and depression symptoms and status among adolescents. J. Adolesc. 2017;55:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ma C., Li Z., Tong Y., Zhao M., Magnussen C.G., Xi B. Leisure sedentary time and suicide risk among young adolescents: Data from 54 low- and middle-income countries. J. Affect. Disord. 2022;298:457–463. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Östberg D. Master’s Thesis. Umeå University; Umeå, Sweden: 2016. [(accessed on 6 September 2022)]. Predicting Depression and Anxiety with a Single Self-Rated Health Item. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:902120/FULLTEXT01.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.