Table 3.
Methodological quality of the studies using the tool RoB 2.0.
| First Author Name | Randomization Process | Deviation from the Intended Intervention | Missing Results Data | The Measurement Result | Selection of the Result Reported | General Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batatinha, 2020 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Cox, 2007 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Gill, 2016 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Gleeson, 2011 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Gleeson, 2012 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Gleeson, 2016 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Haywood, 2013 | Some concerns | Some concerns | Low | Low | Some concerns | High |
| Kekkonen, 2007 | High | Low | Low | Highs | Low | High |
| Komano, 2018 | Low | Low | Low | High | Low | High |
| Marinkovic, 2016 | Low | Low | Low | High | Low | High |
| Pugh, 2019 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Pumpa, 2019 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Schreiber, 2021 | Some concerns | Low | Some concerns | Low | Low | High |
| Strasser, 2016 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Tavares-Silva, 2021 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| West, 2011 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |