Table 5.
Factors affecting cyberbullying perpetration before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Model 1 (2019) | Model 2 (2020) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | S.E. | Wald | Odds Ratio | B | S.E. | Wald | Odds Ratio | |
Gender | −0.509 ** | 0.164 | 9.591 | 0.601 | −0.791 *** | 0.171 | 21.292 | 0.454 |
Friendship reliability | 0.476 * | 0.229 | 4.318 | 1.610 | 0.080 | 0.174 | 0.212 | 1.083 |
Number of friends perpetrating cyberbullying | 0.881 *** | 0.175 | 25.454 | 2.413 | 0.863 *** | 0.234 | 13.605 | 2.370 |
Cyberbullying observation | −1.041 *** | 0.184 | 32.036 | 0.353 | −0.734 *** | 0.203 | 13.068 | 0.480 |
Exposure to harmful content | −1.083 *** | 0.158 | 46.702 | 0.339 | −1.064 *** | 0.115 | 84.975 | 0.345 |
Parent–child interaction | −0.159 | 0.260 | 0.373 | 0.853 | 0.924 *** | 0.213 | 18.810 | 2.519 |
School involvement | −0.016 | 0.120 | 0.018 | 0.984 | 0.312 * | 0.133 | 5.513 | 1.367 |
Awareness of cyberbullying issues | 0.139 | 0.382 | 0.133 | 1.150 | 0.452 ** | 0.166 | 7.387 | 1.571 |
Constant | 2.255 ** | 0.807 | 7.816 | 9.538 | −0.648 | 0.736 | 0.776 | 0.523 |
2Log likelihood | 1074.518 | 1059.380 | ||||||
Cox and Snell’s R2 | 0.098 | 0.132 | ||||||
Nagelkerke R2 | 0.181 | 0.249 | ||||||
χ2 | 162.979 | 245.400 | ||||||
Accuracy | 86.7 | 87.6 |
* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.