Table 8.
Results summary.
| No. | Hypothesis | Beta | t Statistic | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | EE → CI | 0.314 | 5.284 *** | Supported |
| H2 | FC → CI | 0.091 | 2.246 ** | Supported |
| H3 | PE → CI | 0.491 | 10.425 *** | Supported |
| H4 | SI → CI | 0.075 | 1.756 * | Supported |
| H5 | TMS → CI | −0.067 | 1.515 | Not supported |
| H6 | A → PE → CI | 0.104 | 2.958 *** | Supported |
| H7 | C → PE → CI | 0.018 | 0.487 | Not supported |
| H8 | E → PE → CI | 0.033 | 1.156 | Not supported |
| H9 | N → PE → CI | −0.033 | 0.975 | Not supported |
| H10 | O → PE → CI | 0.092 | 2.575 *** | Supported |
| H11 | EE × C → CI | −0.029 | 0.532 | Not supported |
| H12 | FC × C → CI | −0.047 | 1.269 | Not supported |
| H13 | PE × C → CI | −0.097 | 2.021 ** | Supported |
| H14 | SI × C → CI | 0.095 | 2.133 ** | Supported |
Note: t values > 1.96 * (p < 0.05); t values > 2.33 ** (p < 0.02); t values > 2.575 *** (p < 0.01) 2-tail test. EE = effort expectancy, FC = facilitating conditions, PE = performance expectancy, SI = social influence, A = agreeableness, C = conscientiousness, E = extraversion, N = neuroticism, O = openness to experience, CI = continuous intention.