Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;19(17):10816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710816

Table A6.

Separate Regression Analyses for the Moderators Predicting Reliability Scores of the Peer Network and Dyadic Loneliness Scale (PNDLS).

Moderator k B SE B 95% CI F df p
Subscale 16 1.95 1, 14 0.18
  Peer network loneliness 8 −1.89 0.07 −2.05, −1.74
  Peer dyadic loneliness 8 −1.79 0.07 −1.95, −1.64
Age 16 10.41 1, 14 0.01
  Children 6 −1.69 a 0.06 −1.82, −1.57
  Adolescence 10 −1.95 a 0.05 −2.06, −1.84
Gender 16 −0.30 0.32 −0.99, 0.38 0.90 1, 14 0.36
Country 16 0.94 1, 14 0.35
  US 6 −1.77 0.10 −1.99, −1.55
  Non-US 10 −1.90 0.09 −2.09, −1.71
Translated 16 0.94 1, 14 0.35
  No 6 −1.77 0.10 −1.99, −1.55
  Yes 10 −1.90 0.09 −2.09, −1.71
Adaptation 16 2.34 1, 14 0.15
  Original scale 11 −1.91 0.07 −2.07, −1.76
  Brief version 5 −1.73 0.09 −1.93, −1.53

Note. Effects sizes are significantly different if they do not have the same subscript. For the categorical variables, the given regression coefficients represent the mean effect sizes for each category. k = number of effect sizes; B = regression coefficient; CI = confidence interval.