Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710758

Table 7.

Results of hypothesis testing using 5000 bootstrap subsamples.

Hypotheses Path Coefficients t-Value p Value Support? (Yes/No)
H1 BI → PEU 0.673 15.278 <0.001 Yes
H2 ATT → BI 0.534 10.564 <0.001 Yes
H3 PU → ATT 0.324 5.558 <0.001 Yes
H4 PU → BI 0.253 5.093 <0.001 Yes
H5 PEOU → PU 0.440 8.452 <0.001 Yes
H6 SI → ATT 0.027 0.877 0.381 No
H7 SI → BI −0.026 0.743 0.458 No
H8 PBC → BI 0.109 2.019 0.043 Yes
H9 PBC → PEU 0.165 3.109 0.002 Yes
H10 PEOU → PCV 0.369 7.443 <0.001 Yes
H11 PCV → ATT 0.196 3.294 0.001 Yes
H12 PCB → PCV 0.507 10.444 <0.001 Yes
H13 PCB → PU 0.432 8.672 <0.001 Yes
H14 PCB → ATT 0.391 7.675 <0.001 Yes
H15 PPR → PU −0.061 1.981 0.048 Yes
H16 PPR → ATT −0.006 0.200 0.842 No
H17 PPR → BI 0.060 2.078 0.038 Yes

Note: ATT = Attitude; BI = Behavioral intention; PCB = Perceived credibility; PCV = Perceived convenience; PEOU = Perceived ease of use; PPR = Perceived privacy risks; PBC = Perceived behavioral control; PU = Perceived usefulness; SI = Social influence; PEU = Perceived effective use.