Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;9:994502. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994502

Table 2.

Baseline and procedural characteristics and 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing TTV repair with edge-to-edge devices.

Edge-to-edge repair
MitraClip TriClip PASCAL
Besler et al. Mehr et al. Ruf et al. Nickenig et al. Fam et al. Kodali et al.
(14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19)
N of patients 117 249 50 85 28 34
Age 79 79 80 (78–83) 77.8 78 76.3
STS-PROM score, % 5.3 NA NA NA 4.6 ± 2.8 7.3
Functional TR 223 (89) NA 71 (84) 29 (88)
TR severity
- None-/Moderate 7 (6) 8 (3) 7 (14) 5 (6) 1 (3)
- ≥Severe 110 (94) 241 (97) 43 (86) 80 (94) 28 (100) 32 (97)
Procedural outcomes
Procedural success 95 (81) 192 (77) 50 (100) 76 (91) 24 (86) 24 (80)
Number of devices 2 ± 1 2 ± 1 1.7 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.8 1.4 ± 0.6 1.2
Conversion to open surgery NA 1 (0.4) 0 0 0 NA
Device embolization or malposition NA NA 0 0 0 NA
30-day outcomes
Mortality 0 7 (2.8) 0 0 2 (7.1) 0
Stroke NA 2 (0.8) NA 0 0 0
Major or life-threatening bleeding NA 15 (6) NA 0 0 2 (5.9)
TR severity
- None-Moderate 92 (78) 192 (77) 37 (54) 73 (85.6) 22 (85) 14 (52)
- ≥Severe 25 (22) 57 (23) 23 (46) 12 (14.4) 4 (15) 13 (48)

Continuous values are expressed as mean ± SD, mean (range) and median [interquartile range] as reported by authors. Categorical values are expressed as n (%).