Table 4.
Results of four negative binomial GLMMs examining the differences in individuals’: aggression given, aggression received, submissive status given and submissive status received, during the post-introduction compared to the pre-introduction period, across macaque groups that experienced a successful male introduction.
| Outcome | Predictors | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Age | Dominance rank | Relatedness coefficient | Stage (post- vs pre-introduction) | |
| Aggression given | 1.37** | −0.03 | 2.29** | −0.13 | −0.82** |
| Aggression received | 4.11** | −0.10 | −1.81** | −0.09 | −0.79** |
| Status given | 4.99** | −0.06 | −1.93** | −0.09 | −0.49 |
| Status received | 1.86** | −0.03 | 3.46** | −1.15** | −0.61(*) |
Values in cells indicate β coefficients (effect sizes) for predictor variables (listed in the first row) for each of the four models. In each model, we included a 2-level nested random effect of categorical ‘group ID’ (level-2), and ‘year of observation’ (level-1).
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
0.05 < p < 0.10.