Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;16(1):124–138. doi: 10.14444/8181

Table 3.

Summary of outcomes and adverse events for each treatment modality.

Variable Open Surgery Minimally Invasive Full Endoscopic Percutaneous CystRupture and Aspiration P Value < 0.05
N 1112 279 263 497
Age, y, mean (range) 63 (54.4–73) 65.3 (62–72.4) 49.2 (23.1–68.6) 63.2 (58.7–68.2)
Sex, male 51.9% 55.6% 52.9% 57.8%
Follow-up, mo, mean (range) 39.5 (8.3–116.4) 24.0 (11.5–79) 27.5 (18–55.5) 24.2 (11–44.5)
Preoperative degenerative listhesis, % 33.6% 21.1% 8.3% 3.9%  a,b,c,d,e,f
Satisfactory outcome, % MacNab excellent—good scores (95% CI) 93.0% (88.3%–96.7%) 82.7% (61.2%–97.5%) 90.9% (83.8%–96.4%) 66.2% (52.9%–78.4%)  c,e,f
Recurrence, % (95% CI) 1.4% (0.3%–3.2%) 2.3% (0.3%–5.5%) 3.0% (0.0%–9.9%) 34.3% (20.3%–49.6%)  c,e,f
Revisions, % (95% CI) 3.0% ( 1.3%–5.3%) 3.6% (1.0%–2.3%) 2.2% (0.0%–8.3%) 29.8% (18.9%–42%)  c,e,f
Developing postoperative instability, % (95% CI) 3.5% ( 0.6%–8.0%) 3.2% (0.2%–8.4%) 0% /
Intraoperative/procedural adverse events, % (95% CI) 1.1% ( 0.1%–3.0%) 8.4% (2.7%–16.3%) 1.8% (0.0%–5.3%) 0.1% (0.0%–1.2%)  a,d,c,e,f

Significant differences between: a = open vs minimally invasive; b = open vs full endoscopic; c = full-endoscopic vs percutaneous cyst aspiration and rupture; d = minimally invasive vs full endoscopic; e = minimally invasive vs percutaneous cyst aspiration and rupture; f = full-endoscopic vs percutaneous cyst aspiration and rupture; / : not reported.