Pehlivan 2011.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Setting: not described. Study undertaken in Turkey Study duration: January 2007 to August 2008. Exercise training: 1 week before lung resection until hospital discharge |
|
Participants | 60 participants (mean age: control group: 55 (SD 8) years; exercise group: 54 (SD 9) years, with NSCLC (stages I–IIIB), referred for lung resection | |
Interventions | Control (30 participants): usual care with no formal preoperative exercise training. Exercise (30 participants): intensive physical therapy (chest physiotherapy and walking exercise). Chest physiotherapy consisted of diaphragmatic, pursed lip, segmental breathing exercise, usage of incentive spirometry and coughing exercise. Walking exercise performed on a treadmill 3 times a day, according to the participant's tolerance to exercise speed and time. Postoperatively: routine physical therapy performed until discharge in both groups. |
|
Outcomes | Postintervention
Postoperatively
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Comment: different quotes in 2 parts of the paper. Both methods described were at high risk of failure. Quotes: "… randomly allocated (according to hospital record number) to control or study group"; "Allocation was based on hospital record number". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: no blinding of participants and personnel. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: study appeared free of other sources of bias. |