Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Mar 4;56(4):1207–1219. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28136

Table 1:

Demographics for each cohort within the feasibility and applicability groups of this study. Values are reported as percent for discrete variables and medians with the first and third quantiles for continuous variables. P-values are with respect to the corresponding pediatric cohort for the feasibility groups and with respect to the pediatric healthy group for the applicability group. Significant differences are bolded.

N % Male % Healthy Age FEV1 % FVC % FEV1/FVC% DLCO % SpO2 Drop
Median, N [Q1-Q3] (P-value)

Feasibility
Cohorts
Pediatric 45 55.6 15.6 10.0
[8.3–13.7]
86, N=34
[71–101]
88, N=34
[72–104]
85, N=34
[78–90]
77, N=15
[66–101]
4, N=44
[2–7]
Adult 32 40.6
(0.20)
28.1
(0.18)
29.7
[22.8–44.4]
(<0.01)
90, N=13
[84–100]
(0.17)
98, N=13
[81–109]
(0.15)
80, N=13
[77–85]
(0.06)
98, N=5
[52–110]
(0.48)
7, N=27
[4–8]
(0.02)

Pediatric
Applicability
Cohorts
Healthy 5 60 8.8
[7.0–11.1]
110, N=1
[N/A]
115, N=1
[N/A]
86, N=1
[N/A]
N/A, N=0 3, N=5
[2–6]
BMT 12 58
(0.45)
12.6
[8.5–17.4]
(0.28)
83, N=12
[61–100]
(0.05)
82, N=12
[65–96]
(0.05)
89, N=12
[79–93]
(0.34)
77, N=8
[67–84]
(N/A)
9, N=12
[6–16]
(0.02)
BPD 4 50
(0.69)
7.4
[5.7–9.0]
(0.52)
77, N=2
[65–88]
(0.11)
86, N=2
[74–97]
(0.11)
82, N=2
[81–82]
(0.11)
109, N=2
[92–125]
(N/A)
2, N=4
[2–4]
(0.20)
CF 8 63
(0.56)
9.9
[9.2–11.6]
(0.44)
91, N=8
[83–107]
(0.17)
102, N=8
[92–106]
(0.22)
79, N=8
[76–86]
(0.22)
125, N=2
[125–125]
(N/A)
6, N=8
[3–6]
(0.15)
chILD 5 40
(0.46)
13.5
[7.2–16.4]
(0.84)
73, N=5
[59–85]
(0.07)
79, N=5
[63–90]
(0.07)
84, N=5
[78–88]
(0.19)
76, N=3
[57–93]
(N/A)
3, N=5
[0–13]
(0.46)