Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 21;2022:9388813. doi: 10.1155/2022/9388813

(b) Results from multivariate analyses

ALZ or CLA . . . . . 3.78
(0.79, 18.00)
.
1.88
(0.33, 10.73)
Anti-CD20 agents 3.25
(1.46, 7.24)
. . 0.91
(0.39, 2.12)
1.27
(0.31, 5.13)
.
3.64
(0.65, 20.46)
1.88
(0.33, 10.73)
DMF 0.87
(0.37, 2.05)
0.71
(0.30, 1.69)
1.07
(0.40, 2.85)
. 1.12
(0.44, 2.89)
3.48
(0.59, 20.33)
3.64
(0.65, 20.46)
0.96
(0.48, 1.90)
FNG . 0.68
(0.16, 2.82)
0.94
(0.25, 3.57)
.
2.19
(0.38, 12.49)
3.48
(0.59, 20.33)
0.60
(0.32, 1.14)
0.63
(0.27, 1.49)
NTZ 1.27
(0.51, 3.19)
2.25
(0.60, 8.42)
.
2.59
(0.47, 14.12)
2.19
(0.38, 12.49)
0.71
(0.41, 1.23)
0.75
(0.35, 1.57)
1.18
(0.62, 2.25)
No DMT 1.69
(0.66, 4.38)
0.65
(0.15, 2.92)
3.78
(0.79, 18.00)
2.59
(0.47, 14.12)
1.04
(0.50, 2.18)
1.09
(0.48, 2.49)
1.73
(0.80, 3.76)
1.46
(0.75, 2.84)
Platform therapy .
3.18
(0.49, 20.81)
3.78
(0.79, 18.00)
0.87
(0.39, 1.97)
0.91
(0.32, 2.58)
1.46
(0.54, 3.94)
1.23
(0.50, 2.99)
0.84
(0.30, 2.39)
TRF

On the upper triangle, the effect size are direct comparisons; the effect sizes presented on lower triangle are network meta-analyses (indirect comparison). Comparisons should be read from left to right (example for upper triangle: OR (95% CI) of developing COVID-19 in anti-CD20 agents compared to DMF is 3.25 (1.46, 7.24); example for lower triangle: OR (95% CI) of developing COVID-19 in the ALZ or CLA group compared to anti-CD20 agents is 1.88 (0.33, 10.73). Platform therapy: interferon and glatiramer acetate; anti-CD20 agents: rituximab and ocrelizumab. ALZ: alemtuzumab; CLA: cladribine; DMF: dimethyl fumarate; FNG: fingolimod; NTZ: natalizumab; TRF: teriflunomide; DMT: disease-modifying therapy.