Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 21;2022:9388813. doi: 10.1155/2022/9388813

(b) Results from multivariate analyses

DMF . . . . 0.62
(0.40, 0.95)
. 0.34
(0.12, 0.98)
.
1.14
(0.58, 2.22)
FNG . . . 0.55
(0.32, 0.94)
. . .
0.95
(0.46, 1.96)
0.84
(0.38, 1.87)
GA . . 0.65
(0.36, 1.19)
. . .
1.49
(0.70, 3.14)
1.31
(0.57, 3.01)
1.56
(0.65, 3.74)
IFN . 0.36
(0.18, 0.72)
. 0.49
(0.10, 2.46)
.
1.24
(0.67, 2.30)
1.09
(0.53, 2.24)
1.30
(0.61, 2.80)
0.83
(0.38, 1.84)
NTZ 0.51
(0.31, 0.86)
. 0.23
(0.07, 0.78)
.
0.62
(0.42, 0.93)
0.55
(0.32, 0.94)
0.65
(0.36, 1.19)
0.42
(0.22, 0.79)
0.50
(0.31, 0.81)
No DMT 0.61
(0.37, 1.02)
0.39
(0.20, 0.75)
1.37
(0.80, 2.36)
0.38
(0.20, 0.73)
0.34
(0.16, 0.70)
0.40
(0.18, 0.88)
0.26
(0.11, 0.58)
0.31
(0.15, 0.62)
0.61
(0.37, 1.02)
OCR . .
0.32
(0.18, 0.57)
0.28
(0.14, 0.58)
0.34
(0.16, 0.73)
0.22
(0.10, 0.46)
0.26
(0.14, 0.48)
0.52
(0.32, 0.83)
0.84
(0.42, 1.69)
RTX 0.93
(0.19, 4.57)
0.77
(0.40, 1.47)
0.67
(0.32, 1.42)
0.80
(0.37, 1.77)
0.52
(0.23, 1.17)
0.62
(0.31, 1.24)
1.23
(0.74, 2.06)
2.01
(0.97, 4.15)
2.39
(1.22, 4.66)
TRF

On the upper triangle, the effect size are direct comparisons; the effect sizes presented on lower triangle are network meta-analyses (indirect comparison). Comparisons should be read from left to right (example for upper triangle: OR (95% CI) of developing a severe COVID-19 in DMF compared to no DMT is 0.62 (0.40, 0.95); example for lower triangle: OR (95% CI) of developing a severe COVID-19 in DMF compared to FNG is 1.14 (0.58, 2.22). DMF: dimethyl fumarate; FNG: fingolimod; GA: glatiramer acetate; IFN: interferon; NTZ: natalizumab; TRF: teriflunomide; DMT: disease-modifying therapy; RTX: rituximab; OCR: ocrelizumab.