Table 3.
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean days of.. | ||||||
Infectiousness | Fixed | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
Latency | duration | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Panel a: transmission | ||||||
1.17*** | 1.208*** | 1.171*** | 1.273*** | 1.226*** | 1.247*** | |
(0.062) | (0.0458) | (0.0430) | (0.0514) | (0.0511) | (0.0555) | |
Observations | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 |
State-day FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Kleibergen Paap F | 252 | 113.3 | 129.1 | 97.04 | 103.9 | 96.38 |
Hansen J | 3.15 | 4.410 | 4.433 | 4.357 | 4.403 | 4.392 |
p-value | 0.116 | 0.0357 | 0.0352 | 0.0369 | 0.0359 | 0.0361 |
Panel b: conditioned on density | ||||||
0.88*** | 0.711*** | 0.645*** | 0.825*** | 0.723*** | 0.748*** | |
(0.055) | (0.178) | (0.174) | (0.190) | (0.193) | (0.207) | |
x log density | 0.043*** | 0.0706*** | 0.0751*** | 0.0636** | 0.0714*** | 0.0705** |
(0.0051) | (0.0247) | (0.0243) | (0.0266) | (0.0270) | (0.0291) | |
Log density | −0.67* | −0.562* | −0.470* | −0.672** | −0.594* | −0.624* |
(0.37) | (0.296) | (0.278) | (0.323) | (0.319) | (0.338) | |
Observations | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 | 81,594 |
State-day FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Kleibergen Paap F | 44.2 | 10.74 | 11.68 | 9.599 | 10.11 | 9.569 |
Hansen J | 2.87 | 4.280 | 4.286 | 4.255 | 4.292 | 4.296 |
p-value | 0.24 | 0.118 | 0.117 | 0.119 | 0.117 | 0.117 |
Notes. *** 0.01, ** 0.05, * 0.1. Estimated in first differences. Twoway (county and day) clustered standard errors in parentheses. In column 1, the dependent variable is the number of new cases detected at the county-day level andis the 6-day lagged 5-day average number of infected measured within the county. In columns 2–6, the dependent variable is the daily number of county infections implied by the SEIR model based on observed detections. is the pool of infectious as constructed according to the SEIR model. The durations of latency and infectiousness translate to SEIR parameters asandrespectively.