Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;71(2):136–142. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.21-152

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted difference of SM/Ht2, SM/Wt, handgrip strength and adjusted grip strength between the presence or absence of metabolic syndrome

Men Unadjusted Adjusted
MetS (−), n = 121 MetS (+), n = 86 p MetS (−), n = 121 MetS (+), n = 86 p
SM/Ht‍2 (kg/m‍2) 7.3 (0.8) 7.8 (0.8) <0.001 7.3 (7.1–7.5) 7.8 (7.6–8.0) <0.001
SM/Wt (%) 32.7 (3.5) 30.0 (3.1) <0.001 33.1 (32.3–33.8) 30.3 (29.5–31.1) <0.001
Handgrip strength (kg) 32.5 (7.2) 35.2 (8.1) 0.011 33.9 (32.4–35.5) 35.2 (33.6–36.9) 0.186
Adjusted grip strength (%) 52.4 (10.4) 47.8 (9.5) 0.001 54.4 (52.3–56.6) 48.8 (46.4–51.2) <0.001
Women Unadjusted Adjusted
MetS (−), n = 70 MetS (+), n = 94 p MetS (−), n = 70 MetS (+), n = 94 p
SM/Ht‍2 (kg/m‍2) 6.1 (0.7) 6.6 (0.9) <0.001 6.5 (5.7–7.3) 6.9 (6.1–7.6) 0.002
SM/Wt (%) 27.5 (2.3) 24.3 (2.5) <0.001 26.0 (23.3–28.6) 22.8 (20.3–25.4) <0.001
Handgrip strength (kg) 20.5 (4.8) 21.3 (5.4) 0.279 23.8 (19.1–28.5) 23.6 (19.0–28.1) 0.767
Adjusted grip strength (%) 39.5 (8.6) 33.8 (8.3) <0.001 39.5 (30.5–48.5) 33.3 (24.6–42.0) <0.001

SM/Ht‍2, height-adjusted skeletal muscle mass index; SM/Ht, weight-adjusted skeletal muscle mass index; MetS, metabolic syndrome. Adjusted for age, smoking, exercise, and alcohol intake.