Table 2.

Showing compilation of the data available on the variations in the branching pattern of brachial artery published in last 10 years and comparing them with the present study

Author name and year	No. of cases	Tortuous Brachial artery	High bifurcation of brachial artery or superficial brachial artery	High origin of radial artery	High origin of ulnar artery
Bidarkotimath and Avadhani (2011) [48]	100 limbs		2 cases (2.0%)	1 case (1.0%)
Vatsala et al. (2013) [49]	54 limbs		1 case (1.8%)	2 cases (3.7%)	2 cases (3.7%)
Sonje et al. (2014) [50]	50 limbs		-	1 case (1.9%)	2 cases (3.7%)
Deepa and John Martin (2016) [51]	102 limbs		2 cases (2.0%)		-
Kaur et al. (2017) [52]	40 limbs		4 cases (10.0%)		-
Ojha et al. (2019) [53]	80 limbs		3 cases (3.8%)		1 case (1.3%)
Balakrishnan et al. (2020) [54]	78 limbs		12 cases (15.4%)		1 case (1.2%)
Konarik et al. (2020) [55]	423 limbs		40 cases (9.5%)	12 cases (2.8%)	2 cases (0.5%)
Uglietta et al. (1989) (angiographic study) [37]	100 cases		-	7 cases (7.0%)	2cases (2.0%)
Celik et al. (2001) (angiographic study) [56]	81 cases		-	7 cases (8.6%)	1 case (1.2%)
Present study (cadaveric study) (CT Angiographic study)	40 limbs	4 cases*	4 cases (10.0%)*	3 cases (7.5%)/6 cases (15.0%)	2 cases (5.0%)

*Tortuous brachial artery and Superficial brachial artery in same specimens.