Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 23;90:106176. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106176

Table 6.

Summary of companies involved in nanocellulose industrial production.

Type Company Production capacity (tonne per year) Process involved Ref.a, b
CNC CelluForce, Canada 260 H2SO4 hydrolysis, membrane filtration, spray dryer [286]
Alberta Innovates, Canada 5 H2SO4 hydrolysis, centrifuge, membrane filtration, spray drying [286]
U.S. Forest Products Lab, US 3 H2SO4 hydrolysis, dilution, neutralization, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis filtration, diafiltration [287]
Anomera, Canada 1 Dilute H2O2 oxidation, heating or UV radiation, centrifugation or diafiltration, spray drying [288]
Blue Goose Biorefineries, Canada 2 Transition metal-catalysed oxidation, ultrasonication [289]
CNF University of Maine, US 260 Mechanical disc refiner [287]
American Process, US 130 Fractionation with SO2 and ethanol, mechanical treatment (refining, sonication, or microfluidization) [290]
US Forest Products Lab, US <1 TEMPO oxidation, neutralization, disc refining, centrifugation, ultrafiltration, diafiltration, freeze-drying [286], [287]

H2SO4, sulfuric acid; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; SO2, sulfur dioxide. aReferences are included for patents and journals describing the production process, where available. bReferences for production capacity were obtained from the TAPPI organization [291] and McGill University [292].