Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 6;11(9):e1531–e1539. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.04.003

Table 2.

Advantages and limitations

Advantages
  • Reasonable alternative for a young, active patient who wishes to avoid a revision arthroplasty procedure

  • Restoration of valgus stability may help to reduce implant wear and need for accelerated revision

  • The residual allograft remaining can be folded on top of itself to produce a double-stranded reconstruction of the posterior oblique ligament (POL) and ultimately reinforce the posterior capsule

Limitations
  • Limited data on longevity of reconstruction in the setting of beforetal knee arthroplasty

  • Arthroplasty surgeons typically have less experience managing this patient presentation in the setting of additional POL injury

  • Revision arthroplasty procedure may be needed in future due to accelerated polyethylene wear, especially in chronic situations