Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;9:769329. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.769329

Table 4.

Studies comparing discrepancies of GFR estimating equations and estimated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft–Gault) in older adults examining performances between the eGFR analyzed by metrics such as bias, precision, and accuracy.

Schaeffner et al. (77) Bjork et al. (92) Bjork et al. (93) Selistre et al. (102)
(A) Performances between the eGFR analyzed by median bias.
n 610 3,226 805 2,247
Age (yr) >70 70–89 74–93 65–90
Cohort The BIS cohort 5 cohorts (Caucasian) AGES-Reykjavik elderly cohort Single center French cohort
Measured GFR Plasma iohexol clearance Plasma iohexol clearance Plasma iohexol clearance Inulin clearance
Cockcroft–Gault Cr 2.53 (−4.06 to 9.21) n.a n.a n.a
MDRDCr 11.29 (3.85–17.68) n.a n.a n.a
CKD-EPICr 9.69 (2.45–15.49) 3.6 (3.2–4.0) 2.7 (2.1–3.3) −2.0 (−3.0 to −1.0)
BIS-1 (Cr) 0.80 (−5.03 to 6.11) 1.7 (1.2–2.0) n.a. −2.0 (−3.5 to −1.5)
LMRCr n.a −0.7 (−1.0 to −0.4) −4.8 (−5.4 to −4.2)a 2.0 (1.5–3.5)
FASCr n.a 0.6 (0.3–0.9) −5.7 (−6.3 to −5.1) a 0.0 (−0.5 to 0.5)
CKD-EPICys 2.05 (−3.23 to 8.61) −2.7 (−3.1 to −2.3) n.a n.a
FASCys n.a −1.1 (−1.6 to −0.8) n.a n.a
CAPA (Cys) n.a −1.4 (−1.8 to −1.0) n.a n.a
CKD-EPICr+Cys n.a −0.1 (−0.4 to 0.2) 0.6 (−0.1 to 1.2) n.a
BIS-2 (Cr+Cys) 0.87 (−4.40 to 4.98) −1.2 (−1.5 to −0.8) n.a n.a
MEANLMR+CAPA n.a −1.0 (−1.3 to −0.6) −2.7 (−3.2 to −2.1) a n.a
FASCr+Cys n.a −0.8 (−1.1 to −0.5) −5.9 (−6.5 to −5.4) a n.a
(B) Performances between the eGFR analyzed by IQR–Precision.
CKD-EPICr n.a 12.3 (11.9–13.0) 12.1 (11.2–13.4) 15.0 (14.5–17.0)
BIS-1 (Cr) n.a 11.6 (11.1–12.1) n.a 15.0 (14.0–16.5)
LMRCr n.a 10.5 (10.1–11.0) 10.8 (10.1–11.5)b 14.0 (13.0–15.5)
FASCr n.a 11.1 (10.6–11.5) 10.7 (9.9–11.9)b 14.0 (12.5–15.0)
CKD-EPICys n.a 11.8 (11.3–12.5) n.a n.a
FASCys n.a 12.2 (11.7–12.8) n.a n.a
CAPA (Cys) n.a 11.9 (11.3–12.6) n.a n.a
CKD-EPICr+Cys n.a 10.2 (9.6–10.8) 10.2 (9.0–11.1) n.a
BIS-2 (Cr+Cys) n.a 10.5 (10.0–11.0) n.a n.a
MEANLMR+CAPA n.a 9.2 (8.8–9.6) 9.3 (8.5–10.1)c n.a
FASCr+Cys n.a 10.1 (9.7–10.7) 10.0 (9.1–10.9)c n.a
(C) Performances between the eGFR analyzed by P30 accuracy.
Cockcroft–GaultCr 87.4 n.a n.a n.a
MDRDCr 70.9 n.a n.a n.a
CKD-EPICr 77.9 76.4 (74.9–77.9) 91.7 (89.9–93.4) 77.0 (73.0–80.0)
BIS-1 (Cr) 95.1 77.5 (76.1–78.9) n.a. 76.0 (72.5–79.5)
LMRCr n.a 83.5 (82.2–84.8) 95.0 (93.5–96.5)b 80.0 (76.5–83.5)
FASCr n.a 80.9 (79.5–82.3) 95.8 (94.4–97.2)b 78.5 (75.0–82.0)
CKD-EPICys 89.1 78.8 (77.3–80.4) n.a n.a
FASCys n.a 80.9 (79.4–82.4) n.a n.a
CAPA (Cys) n.a 80.3 (78.8–81.8) n.a n.a
CKD-EPICr+Cys 86.8 (85.5–88.1) 96.1 (94.8–97.4) n.a
BIS-2 (Cr+Cys) 96.1 85.7 (84.4–87.0) n.a n.a
MEANLMR+CAPA n.a 88.7 (87.5–89.9) 97.3 (96.2–98.4)b n.a
FASCr+Cys n.a 85.7 (84.4–87.1) 97.8 (96.7–98.8)b n.a
a

Significantly worse (P < 0.05) than corresponding CKD-EPI equation.

b

Significantly better (P < 0.05) than corresponding CKD-EPI equation.

c

No statistical difference (P < 0.05) compared with corresponding CKD-EPI equation.