Table 5.
Path relationship among two nutritive value awareness groups.
| Path relationship | Aware of nutritive value |
Non-aware of nutritive value |
CRD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Std β | t-value | Std β | t-value | ||
| PI→PB | 0.345∗∗∗ | 9.586 | 0.410∗∗∗ | 5.671 | 0.521 |
| PV→PI | 0.294∗∗∗ | 7.690 | 0.150∗∗ | 2.596 | -2.213∗∗ |
| PSU→PV | 0.087∗∗∗ | 2.106 | 0.087 | 1.346 | -0.900 |
| PSE→PV | 0.286∗ | 6.741 | 0.193∗∗ | 2.957 | 0.118 |
| PE→PI | 0.353∗∗∗ | 8.420 | 0.628∗∗∗ | 9.224 | 3.583∗∗∗ |
| PE→PB | 0.393∗∗∗ | 9.445 | 0.318∗∗∗ | 3.818 | -0.994 |
| PSU→PE | 0.198∗∗∗ | 4.608 | 0.158∗ | 2.351 | 0.336 |
| PSE→PE | 0.061 | 1.440 | 0.086 | 1.288 | -0.416 |
| PBC→PI | 0.009 | 0.234 | -0.136∗ | -2.364 | -2.101∗∗ |
| PBC→PB | 0.016 | 0.472 | 0.025 | 0.486 | 0.115 |
| SN→PI | 0.353∗∗∗ | 8.198 | 0.293∗∗∗ | 4.374 | -0.355 |
CMIN/DF = 3.952, RMSEA = 0.053, CFI = 0.939, IFI = 0.939, TLI = 0.930, PNFI = 0.798, PGFI = 0.815.
∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗ Significant at р < 5%, <1% and <0.1%, respectively.