Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;9:961031. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.961031

Table 3.

Comparison between acute and follow-up CMR scans of myocarditis patients after COVID-19 vaccination.

Acute myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination
(n = 16)
Follow-up myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination
(n = 14)
Acute vs. follow-up CMR, myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination
(P values)
Elapsed time, days 4 ± 2 112 ± 27 NA
LVEF, % 58 ± 6 60 ± 3 0.042
LVEDVi, ml/m2 87 ±13 83 ± 9 0.046
LVSVi, ml/m2 50 ± 7 50 ± 6 0.961
LVMi, g 53 ± 10 51 ± 7 0.228
GLS, % −20.5 [−22.5, −19] −21 [−22, −20] 0.083
RVEF, % 58 ± 4 57 ± 5 0.559
RVEDVi, ml/m2 83 ± 10 84 ± 9 0.722
RVSVi, ml/m2 48 ± 6 48 ± 6 0.489
T1 mapping septal, ms 966 [951, 1,016] 957 [950, 965] 0.578
T1 mapping affected area, ms 1,056 [1,038, 1,113] 976 [953.5, 1,018] 0.031
T2 mapping septal, ms 43 [43, 44] 43 [42, 43] 0.375
T2 mapping affected area, ms 51 [50, 55] 44 [43, 47.5] 0.016
ECV septal, % 26 [24, 28] 25.5 [23.5, 27.5] 0.125
ECV affected area,% 38 [35, 41.5] 30.5 [28, 35] 0.016
LGE g 6 [3, 10] 2 [0.5, 4] 0.001
LGE % 7 [3, 12] 3 [1, 4] 0.001

Comparison between acute and follow-up CMR scans myocarditis after COVID-19 immunization. Continuous variables showing a normal distribution are presented as the mean and standard deviations (± SD), and those showing a non-normal distribution are reported as medians and interquartile ranges [IQRs]. Acute and follow-up examinations were compared using paired sample t tests and Wilcoxon tests.

CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECV, extracellular volume; EDVi, left ventricular end diastolic volume index; EF, ejection fraction; ESVi, end systolic volume index; GLS, global longitudinal strain; Mi, mass index; NA, not applicable; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular; SVi, left ventricular stroke volume index.