Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;93:775–782. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4802

Table 5.

Reason for revision or reoperation in revised THAs performed in 2007–2020 in the Netherlands (n = 297). Values are count (%)

Operation groups
1–25 26–50 51–100 101–150 151–200 >200 Total
Revised 33 (3.2) 26 (3.1) 33 (2.4) 21 (1.9) 15 (1.5) 169 (1.6) 297 (1.9)
Indication for revision a
 Loosening of stem 11 11 7 4 6 48 (28) 87 (29)
 Infection 3 4 3 6 3 37 (22) 56 (19)
 Dislocation 4 4 4 4 0 30 (18) 46 (16)
 Periprosthetic fracture 5 4 4 6 2 20 (12) 41 (14)
 Loosening of cup 3 4 4 1 3 15 (8.9) 30 (10)
 Girdlestone 1 1 0 1 1 13 (7.7) 17 (5.7)
 Cup/liner wear 0 0 1 0 0 5 (3.0) 6 (2.0)
 Peri-articular ossification 0 0 2 0 0 2 (1.2) 4 (1.3)
 Other 7 5 9 4 2 26 (15) 53(18)
a

A patient may have more than 1 reason for revision or reoperation.