Table 5.
Reason for revision or reoperation in revised THAs performed in 2007–2020 in the Netherlands (n = 297). Values are count (%)
Operation groups | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1–25 | 26–50 | 51–100 | 101–150 | 151–200 | >200 | Total | |
Revised | 33 (3.2) | 26 (3.1) | 33 (2.4) | 21 (1.9) | 15 (1.5) | 169 (1.6) | 297 (1.9) |
Indication for revision a | |||||||
Loosening of stem | 11 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 48 (28) | 87 (29) |
Infection | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 37 (22) | 56 (19) |
Dislocation | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 30 (18) | 46 (16) |
Periprosthetic fracture | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 20 (12) | 41 (14) |
Loosening of cup | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 15 (8.9) | 30 (10) |
Girdlestone | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 (7.7) | 17 (5.7) |
Cup/liner wear | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 (3.0) | 6 (2.0) |
Peri-articular ossification | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.2) | 4 (1.3) |
Other | 7 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 26 (15) | 53(18) |
A patient may have more than 1 reason for revision or reoperation.