Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):1694–1703. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i9.1694

Table 1.

Comparison between body composition testing modalities

Modality
Accuracy
Advantage
Disadvantage
Anthropometry Low Simple, rapid, not affected by fluid retention Interobserver variability
BIA Moderate Easy, portable, relatively inexpensive Influenced by volume status, requires special equipment
Ultrasound Moderate to high Inexpensive, radiation-free, bedside Interobserver variability
DEXA scan High Suitable for repeat testing Radiation exposure & high cost (but less than CT scan)
CT scan High Allows direct assessment of muscle mass Radiation and contrast exposure, high cost
MRI High No radiation exposure, allows direct assessment of muscle mass Expensive, lacks cut-off values

BIA: Bioelectrical impedance analysis; DEXA: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.