Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 19;119(39):e2210978119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210978119

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

MEF8 and MEF8S are required for the editing of the E-type PPR-targeted sites in mitochondria. (A) Alignment of sequences of mutated alleles generated by CRISPR-Cas9. The fragments between two target sites were deleted. PAM, protospacer adjacent motif; WT, wild type. (B) Schematic illustration of MEF8 protein. The deleted region is indicated. (C and D) Morphology of the wild type and the mef8N64aamef8s mutants. The seeds were germinated on MS media, and 1-wk-old seedlings were transferred to soil and grown in the greenhouse under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h darkness). Images of a 4-wk-old wild-type plant and 6-wk-old mef8N64aamef8s-1 mutant (C) and 6-wk-old wild-type plant and 10-wk-old mef8N64aamef8s-2 mutant (D) were taken. The mef8N64aamef8s mutants were slow-growing and produced sterile flowers. (E) RNA-editing analysis of the wild type and the mef8N64aamef8s mutants. The editing analysis of 4-wk-old seedlings of the wild type and two independent lines of mef8N64aamef8s mutants is shown. The editing status of the wild type and two independent lines of mef8N64aamef8s mutants in mitochondria was analyzed by STS-PCRseq and Sanger sequencing of PCR products, respectively. If the editing extent of one site in the mef8N64aamef8s mutant is decreased over 20% of that in the wild type, this site is considered as depending on MEF8/MEF8S. The known PPRs associated with editing sites are listed in Dataset S1B according to the literature (18, 19).