Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;20(5):290–308. doi: 10.1007/s11914-022-00746-7

Table 1.

Summary of randomised controlled trials of nutrition interventions on muscle mass, strength or function

Author, year, country Population Intervention Control Muscle mass, strength or functional outcome Summary of results
Allingstrup, 2017, Denmark [41] 199 pts, MV, expected to stay >3d in ICU Early goal-directed nutrition (based on indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea) Standard care (25 kcal/kg/day via EN) Primary: SF-36 PCS score at 6 months No difference in SF-36 PCS score between groups, mean, control vs intervention: 23 vs 22.9, diff (95% CI) 0.0 (−5.9–5.8), p = 0.99; data available for n = 88 vs 88 pts
Casaer, 2011, Belgium [42] 4640 pts, at nutritional risk (NRS ≥ 3) Early PN (by day 3) Delayed PN (by day 8) Secondary: 6MWT iADLs

No difference in 6MWT, control vs intervention: median 277 (IQR: 210–345) vs 283 (205–336) metres, p = 0.57; data available for n = 624 vs 603 pts

No difference in n (%) iADLs (control vs intervention: 779 (73.5%) vs 752 (75.5%), p = 0.31); data available for n = 1060 vs 996 pts

Doig, 2013, Australia [43] 1372 pts, contraindications to early EN, expected to stay in ICU >2 d Early PN Standard care Secondary: D60 SF-36 physical function No difference in SF-36 physical function, mean±SD: control vs intervention: 40.7±29.6 vs 42.5±30.8, diff (95% CI) 1.8 (1.85–5.52), p = 0.33; data available for n = 513 vs 524 pts
Doig, 2015, Australia [44] 474 pts, expected to stay in ICU >2 d 100 g/day IV amino acid supplementation Standard care Secondary: D90 SF-36 general health status and physical function

No difference in SF-36 General Health, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 52.8±25.9 vs 50.5±27.2, diff (95% CI) 2.3 (−3.1–7.7), p = 0.41; data available for n = 180 vs 192 pts

No difference in SF-36 Physical Function, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 53.2±33.0 vs 47.7±33.7, diff (95% CI) 5.5 (−1.31–12.3), p = 0.11; data available for n = 180 vs 192 pts

Dresen, 2021, Germany [45•] 42 pts, MV, haemodynamically stable, expected to require >28 d organ support 1.8 g protein/kg/day 1.2 g protein/kg/day Primary: change in ultrasound-derived QMLT from study inclusion to weeks 2 and 4 No difference in muscle loss between groups; change in mean QMLT, control vs intervention: −0.28±0.08 vs −0.15±0.08 mm; p=0.368
Ferrie, 2016, Australia [46] 119 pts, receiving PN, expected to receive ≥3 d of the intervention 1.2 g/kg IV amino acid 0.8 g/kg IV amino acid

Primary: handgrip strength at ICU discharge

Secondary: ultrasound-derived muscle thickness of quadriceps, forearm and mid-upper arm at D7

No difference in handgrip strength, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 15.8±10.3 vs 18.5±10.4 cm; p = 0.054

Greater ultrasound-derived forearm muscle thickness at D7 with intervention, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 2.8±0.4 vs 3.2±0.4 cm; p < 0.0001

Fetterplace, 2018, Australia [47]

Pilot RCT

60 pts, MV <48 h, anticipated to remain MV ≥72 h Volume-based EN with protein supplementation Usual care (continuous hourly rate EN) Secondary: change in ultrasound-derived QMLT from ICU admission to discharge Greater amelioration of QMLT loss with intervention, control vs intervention: mean diff (95% CI) 0.22 (0.06–0.38) cm, p = 0.01
McNelly, 2020, UK [48•] 121 pts, expected MV ≥48 h, requiring gastric EN, multiorgan failure, likely ICU stay ≥7 d and likely survival ≥10 d Intermittent EN Continuous EN Primary: change in ultrasound-derived RF-CSA over 10 days

No difference in RF-CSA, mean±SD, control vs intervention: −19.8±14.2 vs −17.4±14.6 cm, diff (95% CI) −2.4 (−9.7–4.8), p = 0.505

Change to day 10: mean difference (95% CI): −1.1 (−6.1–4.0) %; p = 0.676

Nakamura, 2020, Japan [49•] 50 pts, receiving EN, haemodynamically stable Standard EN + 3 g HMB, 14 g arginine, 14 g glutamine Standard EN Primary: rate of CT-derived femoral muscle volume loss from day 1 to 10 No difference in CT-derived femoral muscle loss, control vs intervention: 14.4±1.6 vs 11.4±1.6 %; p = 0.18
Ridley, 2018, Australia [50] 100 pts, ≥16 y, adm to ICU in previous 48–72 g, receiving MV and expected to continue until day after randomisation, central venous access, ≥1 defined organ system failure Supplemental PN Standard care

Secondary: ICU mobility scale (or 6MWT where possible) at hospital discharge

HGS at hospital discharge

MAMC at hospital discharge

No difference in ICU mobility scale, median [IQR], control vs intervention: 8 [4–10] vs 9 [5–10], p = 0.58; data available for n = 33 vs 25 pts

No difference in handgrip strength, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 20±8 vs 19±13.5 kg, p = 0.71; data available for n=24 vs 19 pts

No difference in MAMC, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 30±5 vs 30±5 cm, p = 0.91; data available for n = 25 vs 22 pts

Viana, 2021, Switzerland [51•] 30 pts, MV, likely survival ≥7 d HMB Placebo (maltodextrin) Primary: magnitude of loss of ultrasound-derived quadriceps muscle CSA from day 4 to 15 No difference in muscle loss between groups; mean skeletal muscle area (control D1 114 (95% CI 43–185.8) to D14 100.4 (95% CI 32.6–168.2) cm2 vs intervention D1 110.5 (95% CI 43.7–177.3) to D14 99.32 (95% CI 25.7–172.92) cm2, p = 0.86

Wischmeyer, 2017, USA

Pilot RCT [52]

125 pts, acute respiratory failure, expected to require MV >72, BMI <25 or ≥35 Standard EN + supplemental PN Standard EN

Secondary: Barthel Index at hospital discharge

HGS at discharge

6MWT at discharge

SF-36 PCS at 3 months and 6 months

Barthel Index, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 46.5±32.1 vs 61.1±32.4, p = 0.08; data available for n = 41 vs 28 pts

SF-36 PCS at 3 months, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 35.3±10.8 vs 33.3±10.1, p = 0.38; data available for n = 27 vs 22 pts

SF-36 PCS at 6 months, mean±SD, control vs intervention: 35.8±11.2 vs 39.3±10.2, p = 0.17; data available for n = 30 vs 20 pts

6MWT, 6-minute walk test; BMI, body mass index; CSA, cross-sectional area; CT, computed tomography; EN, enteral nutrition; D, day; HGS, handgrip strength; HMB, B-hydroxy-B-methylbutyrate; iADLs, independent with activities of daily living; IV, intravenous; MV, mechanical ventilation; PCS, physical component summary; PN, parenteral nutrition; QMLT, quadriceps muscle layer thickness; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SF-36, Short Form 36