Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;12:16349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20347-9

Table 1.

The medians and 95% confidence intervals for all adopted metrics are reported and out-of-bag (OOB) performances of models with and without spatial cross-validation (CV) are compared.

Metric (%) OOB Performance Spatial CV
Acc 72.9 (72.1, 73.3) 69.7 (63.6, 75.7)
F1 65.1 (64.3, 65.7) 62.0 (53.2, 69.0)
Sens 82.5 (81.8, 83.6) 78.7 (69.9, 87.8)
Prec 53.7 (52.8, 54.5) 50.9 (43.0, 59.1)
Spec 68.7 (67.6, 69.2) 69.2 (48.9, 76.0)
AUC 84.1 (83.8, 84.5) 81.3 (76.0, 84.8)

We evaluated our machine learning models in terms of accuracy (Acc), F1 score, sensitivity (Sens), precision (Prec), specificity (Spec) and area under the ROC curve (AUC).