Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;13:978913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978913

Table 3.

Association analysis of dietary scores MEDS, DASH, HEI2015, and depression in sleep disorder subgroup.

Population Dietary scores Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P
Cancer survivor with sleep disorder
MEDS 0.79 (0.71–0.87) <0.001 0.81 (0.74–0.90) <0.001 0.84 (0.76–0.93) 0.001
DASH 0.94 (0.90–0.98) 0.002 0.95 (0.91–0.99) 0.019 0.98 (0.93–1.03) 0.353
HEI 0.97 (0.95–0.99) 0.003 0.98 (0.95–0.99) 0.015 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.355
Cancer survivor without sleep disorder
MEDS 0.91 (0.80–1.03) 0.134 0.93 (0.82–1.05) 0.249 1.00 (0.88–1.14) 0.987
DASH 0.97 (0.91–1.02) 0.205 0.96 (0.91–1.02) 0.221 1.01 (0.95–1.07) 0.714
HEI 0.99 (0.96–1.00) 0.236 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.322 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.530

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MEDS, Mediterranean; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; HEI, Healthy Eating Index; model 1 was an unadjusted model; model 2 was adjusted for sex, age, and race; and model 3 was adjusted for sex, age, ethnicity, smoking history, sleep disorders, education level, family poverty ratio, marital status, BMI, cervix cancer, ovary cancer, uterus cancer, pain relief prescription, and number of different types of cancer.