Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;13:978913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978913

Table 4.

Association analysis of dietary scores and depression in sex subgroups.

Sex Dietary scores Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95%CI) P Or (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P Standardized β
Male
MEDS 0.92 (0.81–1.04) 0.171 0.93 (0.82–1.05) 0.217 1.01 (0.90–1.14) 0.838
DASH 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 0.597 1.03 (0.96–1.10) 0.420 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 0.095
HEI 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.539 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.788 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 0.621
Female
MEDS 0.78 (0.71–0.86) <0.001 0.78 (0.71–0.87) <0.001 0.83 (0.74–0.92) <0.001 −19.16
DASH 0.89 (0.86–0.93) <0.001 0.91 (0.87–0.94) <0.001 0.95 (0.91–0.99) 0.018 −9.91
HEI 0.96 (0.94–0.98) <0.001 0.97 (0.95–0.98) <0.001 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.303

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MEDS, Mediterranean; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; HEI, Healthy Eating Index; model 1 was an unadjusted model; model 2 was adjusted for age, and race; and model was 3 adjusted for age, ethnicity, smoking history, sleep disorders, education level, family poverty ratio, marital status, BMI, pain relief prescription, and number of different types of cancer.