Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;13:978913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978913

Table 6.

Association analysis of dietary scores and depression in the number of tumors subgroup.

Numbers of tumors Dietary scores Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P
One
MEDS 0.81 (0.74–0.88) <0.001 0.83 (0.76–0.90) <0.001 0.90 (0.82–0.98) 0.019
DASH 0.94 (0.91–0.98) 0.002 0.95 (0.91–0.98) 0.006 1.00 (0.96–1.05) 0.890
HEI 0.97 (0.96–0.99) <0.001 0.98 (0.96–0.99) <0.001 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.992
Two or more
MEDS 0.83 (0.69–0.99) 0.041 0.88 (0.71–1.08) 0.202 0.91 (0.75–1.09) 0.299
DASH 0.94 (0.88–0.99) 0.032 0.97 (0.91–1.03) 0.337 0.95 (0.88–1.01) 0.102
HEI 0.97 (0.93–1.01) 0.089 0.98 (0.94–1.03) 0.462 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 0.495

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MEDS, Mediterranean; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; HEI, Healthy Eating Index; model 1 was an unadjusted model; model 2 was adjusted for sex, age, and race; and model 3 was adjusted for sex, age, ethnicity, smoking history, sleep disorders, education level, family poverty ratio, marital status, BMI, cervix cancer, ovary cancer, uterus cancer, and pain relief prescription.