Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 30:1–13. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03628-4

Table 1.

Summary of Latent Class Analysis Information Criteria (N = 2,137)

# classes MLL AIC BIC aBIC Entropy LMR-LRT1
1 -173262.52 347521.10 350343.31 116525.09 -- --
2 -54319.42 108846.80 109435.84 109105.41 0.894 7661.74
3 -53391.99 107099.98 107994.80 107492.81 0.931 1854.86
4 -52849.69 106123.39 107324.03 106650.48 0.937 1084.60
5 -52437.69 105407.38 106913.84 106068.73 0.937 824.00
6 -52122.50 104885.01 106697.30 105680.63 0.916 630.38
7 -51822.60 104393.21 106511.33 105323.09 0.920 599.80

Notes. MLL = Maximum log-likelihood, AIC = Akaike information criterion, BIC = Bayesian information criterion, aBIC = adjusted Bayesian information criterion, LMR-LRT = Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted Likelihood Ratio Test. 1 LMR-LRT k(-1) Model comparisons were all significant at p < .001. The four-class solution was identified as optimal and highlighted in boldface