Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 15.

Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 13;262:119440. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119440

Table 2.

Comparison of the HRFs obtained for the PBR and NBRs (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; uncorrected).

Measurements		Attended	Unattended
Onset time	PBR vs. cNBR	Δt = 0.1703 s, p > 0.2384	Δt = 0.0301 s, p > 0.8619
	PBR vs. iNBR	Δt = 0.0102 s, p > 0.9539	Δt = 0.0261 s, p > 0.8575
Time to peak	PBR vs. cNBR	Δt = 0.8773 s, p < 0.0001 (**)	Δt = 1.0369 s, p < 0.0037 (**)
	PBR vs. iNBR	Δt = 0.8193 s, p < 0.0008 (**)	Δt = 1.1384 s, p < 0.0031 (**)
Amplitude	PBR vs. cNBR	Δ = 0.2914, p < 8.2659e-08 (**)	Δ = 0.4315, p < 3.6432e-15 (**)
	PBR vs. iNBR	Δ = 0.2336, p < 8.7143e-08 (**)	Δ = 0.4095, p < 1.5076e-13 (**)
Falling edge time	PBR vs. cNBR	Δt = 1.2499 s, p < 0.0182 (*)	Δt = −0.2783 s, p > 0.6386
	PBR vs. iNBR	Δt = 0.9318 s, p > 0.0547	Δt = −1.8553 s, p < 0.0017 (**)
Time to undershoot	PBR vs. cNBR	Δt = 2.5450 s, p < 0.0098 (**)	Δt = 0.3628 s, p > 0.6663
	PBR vs. iNBR	Δt = 1.2161 s, p > 0.1999	Δt = t = 0.1360 s, p > 0.8792