Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 7;122(18):14842–14880. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00212

Table 4. Neuronal Cell Types Used for Engineering Neuronal Circuits in Microfluidic Devices.

cell type cell source advantages disadvantages
Primary Neurons335 embryonic or early postnatal brains most closely express the markers and perform the functions of their tissue of origin limited availability
    dissection and preparation require substantial skills
  well-established culturing protocols are available heterogeneous neuronal cell types
  no genetic modifications possible changes in cell types and numbers over time
Cell Lines336,337 mainly derived from tumors or genetically immortalized cells (e.g., PC12, NG 108, NIE) offer an unlimited cell source abnormal genotype of tumor-derived cells
  generate single cell types  
    might be functionally incomplete or different from in vivo and primary neurons
Fetal Neuronal Stem Cells337 aborted fetus brains no genetic modifications ethical issues associated with abortion
  naturally primed for neuronal fate  
Adult Neuronal Stem Cells338 subventricular zone (SVZ) of lateral ventricle and subgranular zone (SGZ) of hippocampal dentate gyrus no genetic modifications difficult to obtain
  ethical issues are avoided limited source of cells
  naturally primed for neuronal fate highly sensitive to chemical and mechanical manipulations
ESCs337 blastocysts inner cell mass (mainly obtained from embryos produced for in vitro fertilization) extensively characterized biological features and differentiation paradigms ethical issues due to destruction of embryos
    ESCs in differentiated NSCs may form teratomas
iPSCs60 reprogrammed adult human or rodent cells (e.g., skin fibroblasts)42,43 ethical issues are avoided genomic instability may be induced by reprogramming
  can be differentiated to desired neuronal cell types might be functionally incomplete or different from in vivo and primary neurons
  offer unlimited source of cells